Would you buy a boat that didn't aesthetically appeal to you....

We're right on the edge, with our new-to-us fixer-upper. We started with a clean-sheet review of all boats (in budget) with features we wanted. Surprisingly, only two came really close. We had assumed for years that we'd eventually buy an X... but the Y checked more boxes. Can't say as I like Y exterior styling, but it at least doesn't make me puke when I look at it.

And most things on Y worked OK "enough" on our 1100-mile delivery, just finished yesterday. It'll probably take me another year to get the whole thing back up to snuff, though.

-Chris

With production boats, You have the choice by studying the market. Nobody can force You to buy an ugly boat. With some of those production boats, You have the choice of different internal layouts but normally the external design is rather fixed. But even here, on the internal decoration, a bad taste or no taste at all, can turn a otherwise good looking boat into an evidence of tastelessness.

With semi custom boats, You may have much more possibilities to improve for the worse. But a good semi custom yard will prevent You from building an ugly duckling, as they are normally not willing to spoil their reputation.

With fully custom yachts it is more difficult. If for example, a small yard works without a designer but only with an external naval architect for the hull lines and the trim, things can go easily for the worse. They need the contract and they will built You anything, as long it is safe and can be certified. The results are the reason for this thread. But I admit, some of those improvements for the worse are made after sale and with the second owner.

I have an example in my wider acquaintance, where the wife of the owner was "wearing the trousers at home". Her inputs made an ugly boat and I mean an really ugly boat. The poor husband did not dare to contradict and the small yard gave up. Optically this boat was a nightmare for the owner and for the beholder. But finally it freed the owner, he got a divorse .

Larger yachts are a different story. You always work with external and internal designers. You either pick the designer of Your choice or You accept the or one of the designers presented by the yard. You may pick two different designers for the external and the internal design or one doing the internal and external design.

I personally prefer one designer for both, inside and outside. I believe, the final result will be in most cases more harmonious and balanced.

A good designer will listen to You during the initial design briefing and will convert Your words into lines on paper or on the screen. For the next meetings, he will develope a first draft. With modern 3D CAD and graphics software, this draft can already be pretty realistic. Will say, together with a good designer, You will be able to create a nice yacht.

And exactly here is the problem. Picking the right designer.

Some of those artists among yacht designers, like for example Philippe Starck (Sailing yacht A, Venus, Port Adriano) will not listen very much, if at all, to the potential owner. You either accept their piece of art or leave it. They want a carte blanche. Others are more easy to talk to and to negotiate with.

Names like

• Andrew Winch - Winch Design.
• Bannenberg & Rowell Design - Dickie Bannenberg and Simon Rowell.
• Ed Dubois - Dubois Yachts.
• Espen Oeino - Espen Oeino International.
• Ken Freivokh - Ken Freivokh Design.
• Terence Disdale - Terence Disdale Design.
• Tim Heywood - Tim Heywood Design

are much easier to work with.

One designer couple, I was in contact with once and I did run away from, are Pascale Reymond and Andrew Langton. Artists with (in my personal opinion) a confused taste. They tell You on the first meeting, that they know better than You and just like Phillipe Starck, they want a kind of carte blanche also. But at least they tell You. Phillipe Starck just assumes, that You know he is God (the god of the designer, of course ).

My prefered external and internal designers are Andrew Winch and Espen Oeino. Their list of perfect large sailing and power yachts are endless. For traditional large sailing yachts, Dutch Designers like Pieter Beeldsnijder or Andre Hoek come into my mind.

TBC

Ed Dubois isn't easy to talk to, sadly.

Andre Hoek went up in my estimation with last year's launch of Blue II, which I know well

Sorry for having Ed Dubois on my list, as he died 5 years ago. But I talked to him during the design phase of Twizzle and during the build of this magnificent boat at Roayl Huisman. I lost contact ever since.

At the moment I am in contact with some lesser known German designers for a new project on the Weser River. Some of them are really good but also here are some Extremists offering their sevices. Especially one German female internal designer with a really confused taste comes into my mind.

Examples:

- Judel / Vrolijk Design (especially Torsten Conradi for large sailing yachts), Bremen
- Beiderbeck Design, Lemwerder
- Egg and Dart Design, Munich
- Frank Neubelt (Newcruise), Hamburg

But at least we have the free choice. Picking a bad designer is one's own fault.

At least we are still allowed to discuss what is beautiful & what is ugly. Let’s not make a big deal of it or the next thing you know ”we” will be told that all boats are to be regarded in the same way, lest we make some poor boat feel “Excluded”…

It is truly in the eye of the beholder. There is a buyer for every boat & a proud owner for every ugly duckling, especially if it was designed & built or altered & added to by the owner.

I have designed many luxury homes (although must state I am not a qualified architect), also have worked with some amazing architects & built their designs. What at first seems ugly, sometimes becomes the opposite. If you look at the working boats from the past, they have a rough beauty that is timeless. Those Krogens that at first look cumbersome & ugly, will seem beautiful after a while.

Without putting on a tie-died T shirt, dropping some acid with The Grateful Dead playing in the background, the fact seems to be that human race will look for the “Golden Ratio” without realising it. This is what is called Phy or Phi & is the rule of the formula of proportions. May sound out there, but it is in everything we find truly pleasing to see.

So when someone says they like the look of That, it’s the ratio Man!

Margaret Wolfe Hungerford
Quote - “Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.”

You don’t think a Pontiac Aztec, a carver Mariner or a BN3 Trislander are ugly? Come on... be honest. Be blunt. It feels good once in a while

Pascal, we had the twin engine BN2 Islander in the family for several years and I collected some interesting stick time on that bird. Not pretty but very useful on short routes and landing on short unprepared airfields. As a glider pilot, I was used to small airstrips but taking a 1+9 seat twin engine aircraft in and out of 600 ft unprepared runways, was real good training for the young man.

They are still in use by some small airlines in northern Germany for the island hopping to the Frisian Islands in the North Sea. Single pilot, 8 to 10 minutes VFR flying time and the pilot has to load and unload the baggage. Up to 40 and more tripps a day. Pretty tough job.

But the BN3 Trislander is really on the edge. I have had one short demo flight in one during the Farnborough Air Show. I was not amused, when the demo pilot switched off and feathered both wing engines and remained in the traffic pattern with the tail engine. I am not saying the bird is ugly but at least it takes time getting used to the design and most of all to the noice of that bird. Three roaring Lycommings without effective mufflers can be pretty painfull to the ears .

And if something is really, I mean really ugly, we should be allowed to express that in the most possible polite way. My polites way is shaking my head and walk away!!

Poor man’s DC-10.

Well bless that owners heart......
That's polite.. no?

that’s good...

The BN2 is not bad looking... the nose on the 3 though...

For the non-flyers here on YF an example of this beauty, we are talking about:

The mighty Britten Norman BN3 Trislander


I would like to meet the beholder, who can see beauty in her. Btw. the flight characteristics of that "thing" are pretty difficult to get used to.

Ok, back to boats .

Well, one more airplane, since we are talking about looks…

That looks like someone who knows exactly what they've got and are just rolling with it.

Btw. all of the above mentioned aesthetically challenging aircraft were built on those islands in the North Sea, where they drive on the wrong side of the road .

Sorry, could not resist.

Funny how the UK is home to some of the best looking cars ever made and some of the ugliest aircrafts.

I agree with you. With that being said I did just agree with a guy who asked me if a Carver 570 Voyager Pilothouse that it was a good boat for what he wants to do. He wants to do the Great Loop and that will be a good boat for that. I don't like the European design of the exterior but I do know two couples that own Carvers and are very pleased with them.

I once saw a quote about European aviation...

If it's weird, it's French.
If it's ugly, it's Russian.
If it's weird, and ugly, it's British.