Click for Delta Click for Cross Click for Abeking Click for Westport Click for Walker

Single Engine... vs more

Discussion in 'Technical Discussion' started by karo1776, Oct 27, 2013.

You need to be registered and signed in to view this content.
  1. NYCAP123

    NYCAP123 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Messages:
    11,208
    Location:
    Long Island, NY
    OK, that reminded me of several conversations I got into on late nights back in the 60's. I was never very good at French, but is your location anywhere near Amsterdam?:D

    I just translated it, and I was pretty close. My translator gives Karo 1776's location as "S--T very very deep." Seriously!
  2. olderboater

    olderboater Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2013
    Messages:
    7,130
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    While that is all interesting theory on potential solutions, the original discussion was really about the choices available today. That means those choices being marketed by boat manufacturers and it really goes back to simply single vs. twin, which we've discussed and various people have expressed views both ways.

    I have no doubt better systems may be developed in the future. However, I'm dealing with the choices today. Also, all those additional things you bemoan complicating things help to provide the amenities that make our boating even more enjoyable. While some would prefer old, simple ways and "roughing it" a bit, I'm not one of those. I want it all. Greedy. But I want what is provided by all the energy producing equipment. To be marketable, the ultimate long term systems won't start taking features and benefits away, but will simply figure out how to offer them more efficiently.
  3. karo1776

    karo1776 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2011
    Messages:
    655
    Location:
    Gone
    NYCAP123... if I took overnighter holiday to Amsterdam to have a late night talk the lady of the house might be insisting on an early mourning confessional because she might think I was not just talking boating... a language she understands not at all.

    Olderboater... you are right we are all wanting it all. Like I said if we had a magic power source that did everything, never broke down, needed no maintenance and turned on and off with a switch on the helm there would be no discussion. But I think this could be gone about differently.

    The subject of this thread is single engine vs. more... now conventionally that is one propulsion engine vs two or more. But to me it also has the meaning of ONE ENGINE.

    I am not talking about new technology but new way of configuring current technology. Why not have one engine to power the boat... both propulsion and otherwise. Why not have another technology such as a modern storage battery system as back up. If the power plant fails the batteries make for a back up.
    This could be taken further if fuel cells become more common.

    Submarines use one power source... and a second power storage system by tradition. Diesel electric boats have batteries in addition to the diesel power... and a few have fuel cells too for a total of three independent and different power supplies. Nuclear have batteries and emergency generators (this last for reactor protective functions) besides the nuclear plant.

    Why cannot a yacht have on power source that is a diesel engine powered and backup of a second like batteries or something else. Most sail boats now days have sails and a diesel so there are two sources... thought to sail one still needs power to supply the sail handling equipment too.

    So why cannot a yacht have one engine either directly driving the shaft with a generator/motor in series where the diesel can be operate either the generator and shaft or shaft or generator only. Then have batteries for back up.

    Or why cannot a yacht have the diesel driving a generator only with batteries for backup and the propulsion and other loads electrically driven.

    Yachts seldom operate at top speed and for only brief periods... so they are over powered... you could have a smaller diesel being used and use the batteries for the peak load.

    This is all standard stuff but not applied to yachting because of convention. But it would make yachts more roomy... likely more reliable and safer... have lower operating costs... have less space devoted to the machinery... require fewer crew... and be less expensive to operate or build.

    The J boat Rainbow recreation faced the problem as there was limited space available but the owner wanted it all. Now they did not go as far as I have suggested but came closer.

    This subject came up when I was thinking about another boat and replacing two engines with four. The lady of the house... who is truly always right on everything... though I am too stubborn to generally admit it... she said one word... POURQUOI !

    At first I was thinking she meant 'why get the boat'... which she did... then I thought she meant 'why replace the two with the four'... which she did... but it really took me back when she said, "Pourquoi avez-vous besoin plusieurs ... que l'on est assez pour une voiture." Basically... "why do you need many... when one is enough for a car".

    BUT like everyone else I found this IS HORRIFYING TO CONTEMPLATE... I think because we are creatures of habit and cultural convention.
  4. Chapstick

    Chapstick Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2011
    Messages:
    93
    Location:
    Sydney
    I got about half way through your simplification before I got too tired to continue... ;)

    Yep.

    Yes it is, but the chances of BOTH engines failing on the twin is lower than the engine failing on the single.

    For argument's sake let's just assume that you are correct about the increased likelihood of failure on the second engine after the failure on the first.
    Even if it's small, the chance of the second engine continuing to work is greater than zero - so the chance of both engines failing is always going to be less than the chance of a single engine failing.

    Sounds good to me!
  5. K1W1

    K1W1 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2005
    Messages:
    7,427
    Location:
    My Office
    Hi,

    If redundancy is your target you need as many things to be backed up with an alternate arrangement as possible.

    I am aware of a project under way that will have two conventional diesel engines driving shafts and props.

    In the event that these are disabled or the props are wiped out there are also two electrically driven retractable azimuthing thrusters that can be used to get you somewhere.

    Another use for them will be to move in areas where the main engines are too much for the movement required.

    The gensets are in their own compartment and have their own service tank arrgt although the main fuel reserve is a common source the chances of fuel being the issue that causes the grief are very small with proper fuel husbandry IMO.
  6. ranger58sb

    ranger58sb Senior member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2013
    Messages:
    897
    Location:
    Chesapeake Bay, USA

    Perhaps a variable valve timing thing, where the main 8-cylinder (for example) propulsion diesel only runs on 6, 4, or 2 cylinders when load permits.

    That's becoming common in automobile engines now...

    I certainly wouldn't mind having only one diesel to feed (although that wouldn't work all that great in our current boat). And a diesel-electric drive systems sounds fine to me, perhaps with an azipod drive leg -- or even 2 or more, if necessary (although the simplicity of ONE is attractive).

    -Chris
  7. PacBlue

    PacBlue Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2009
    Messages:
    1,994
    Location:
    Dana Point, Ca
    Comparing a military (submarine) propulsion system to a yacht system will not work for many reasons, including the fact that all members onboard are trained professionals, they have redundant systems on everything, they have a built-in safety net, i.e. if they go down someone WILL come looking for them, they usually travel in "packs", they use government money to procure them, and they may re-purpose them to other navies, but do not have to re-sell them.

    Some individual yachts may be designed for efficiency, but that is not what the market always looks for. A yacht may have to perform it's duties safely for an untrained owner/crew with little to no sea experience so the common twin screw set-up works for a wide range of experience, plus is re-sellable to the masses.
  8. NYCAP123

    NYCAP123 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Messages:
    11,208
    Location:
    Long Island, NY
    I think that what you're describing is the come home feature on many single screw boats. However it lacks the power to actually operate a yacht long term.

    You may not considering the weight of enough batteries to power a yacht nor how they are going to stay charged.

    A few years ago Brian wrote about kite assist being experimented with. Did that ever go anyhere?
  9. karo1776

    karo1776 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2011
    Messages:
    655
    Location:
    Gone
    Thanks everyone for the suggestions and comments.

    I suppose it is one of my fanciful ideas to have "one power source" or lets call that one fuel powered power source and battery backups as a hybrid even.

    And, I accept that at least two power sources are vital... and probably should leave design issues to the experts.

    This is especially true for a sail yacht of a size other than something you would class a daysailer. Why the term especially is I cannot image sail handling totally manually now-a-days on any larger boat. And, if the power system goes out you may be stuck worse than on any power boat. And, it is true for motor yachts too... leave it to the experts.

    But... I really like the idea of an all electric boat... but you have to produce the power somehow. Of course a sail boat has the sails as primary or backup as you please... and the world has been sailed by many with only sails and maybe human powered oars as backup. Now when I was young my ideal was something about 36 to 40 feet or 9-10m and that I though could take me anywhere I wanted. The power sail handling was not something even considered. However, the auxiliary and electric power for lights and some modest hotel loads was. In those days 50 years ago the solution was to have the engine generator do everything... with battery storage. Of course, I thought a windmill or waterwheel electric generator would be the ultimate as I could 'save on fuel costs'. I tried a couple set ups but they were only really suitable for topping up batteries... something today I suppose could be done with properly placed and thought out solar panels. That could have been done in those days too but the panels would have cost what the boat cost so were impractical. And that size boat is way too small... now.

    Now I have to admit when I was 21 I crossed the English Channel in October in very rough weather 3-4m seas maybe a little more... wasn't that bad when I left... after starting off in a few hours it poured rain the whole rest of the way... I suppose a trip in a fold-up kayak might have been a lot more trouble than I thought because of the weather situation... it took about 2 days. Actually seas and weather picked up not long after I started so I wasn't so foolish... except for not checking weather forecast. Arrived in France on the blackest overcast nasty day you could imagine... unless you live in Brittany. Arriving I was so cold, wet, and exhausted I actually lost memory for awhile. Now I was the only power source running on a few chocolate bars and bananas. I sometimes think of doing it again for nostalga but that is only thinking and not doing... but I would be missed and cause some heartache!

    Now it's hard to imagine a boat without power assist for everything. Its unimaginable now to consider a 9-10m other than a day sailor... a kayak is a toy for warm tropical days. But then... now I am spoiled... boats are bigger and it is not so simple.
  10. Belle

    Belle Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2013
    Messages:
    153
    Location:
    Paradise
    Like imagining a car without power steering or power windows or power door locks? I want a boat with a huge windmill. I know...sounds strange but I can dream too. I've wondered sometimes with all the solar talk on land why not more windmills. I mean windmill farms can provide huge amounts of juice. But guess our neighbors wouldn't go for us putting up a 50' windmill. I don't know what the things weigh or if you could actually put one on a boat. But then maybe have a boat with sail, windmill and solar. I still like the Solar Sailor. But then I like gas and diesel engines too.

    Well, I just imagine. I'll leave the techie stuff to those who know it and just know that new things will appear, just don't know when. Seems like sometimes there's a long rut, then suddenly. Like cars. Vast majority on gas and been that way so long. Oops another problem with windmills....bridges.
  11. Belle

    Belle Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2013
    Messages:
    153
    Location:
    Paradise
    Oh and back to the original question. Maybe multi engines just to appease the not always completely rational wife would feels better having more? You know. The one like me. Seriously, the emotional side of this question is relevant in addition to the scientific and engineering side. Man does not live by thought alone. And when you come up with a better system, it has to not only be better, but you have to sell the consumer on it being better and worth it.
  12. karo1776

    karo1776 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2011
    Messages:
    655
    Location:
    Gone
    Belle... I think your idea of using a wind generator.... or large air propeller as a propulsion and energy production means has huge merit... and have seen a couple experimental yachts like this on YouTube.

    The drag of the propeller proves sail like propulsion by direct wind to push on the hull.

    The energy generated by the propeller spinning produces energy for hotel and/or motor based propulsion via electric drive.

    Its not only possible it has been done.... and may be the best of all worlds... though has huge market resistance due to not being "like" something conventional... people get believe what they commonly see is right and are resistive to new ideas... so is the story of technology.
  13. Santelia

    Santelia Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    34
    Location:
    La Maddalena, Porto Santo Stefano, Grado.
    Back to the original question, absolutely go twin.
    There's a number of situations where you surely will thank for having a couple of engines instead of a single one.
    In my opinion, quite all the arguments you are bringing from your experience in atomic power plants cannot be of help at the sea. I understand that you evaluate a lot your arguments coming from your experience in that business, but matters are really so far and with so different variables on the field, that really those arguments cannot be of help.
    Personally, I feel myself surely not "ignorant" neither victim of some sort of "marketing" bluff.
    There's nothing giving you the safety of twin engines when we talk about fuel problems, electrical problems, maneuverability, safety in rough sea, seaworthyness, engine life at crusing speed, and even maneuverability, mooring or moving your boat in a close place or simply making a serious sea maneuver. Surely, a lot of people out there prefers to use an electrical bow thruster rather than remember how to make an excellent maneuver by only using a couple of twin engines. But this is the life.
  14. karo1776

    karo1776 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2011
    Messages:
    655
    Location:
    Gone
    My brother sent me this link today.
    http://news.yahoo.com/virtually-perfect-plane-231500844--politics.html

    Its about the 777 Boeing aircraft's reliability record. Actually this is partly why I have been thinking of less is more for a new boat. Certainly Flt 370 might cause one to rethink but it did fly until it ran out of fuel from the reports coming together.

    That article makes the point I have been trying to make with this post and back up my thinking. I have been thinking for some time only one power source needs to be in operation at any one time on a yacht. Certainly a redundant second is important but really most of the time one is all that would be used at a time.

    Now I agree probably ONE ENGINE is not enough. Using two is a better situation. But in my mind the thinking is on a motor yacht is eliminate all the generators and just have one or TWO diesel electric drives with battery parallel hybrid electric drive/power system... as the only power source. Two large generators... running one most of the time underway at cruise to provide the entire power needs of the boat. But that basically means ONE engine running most of the time with the other in backup for emergency or for high speed runs that is seldom used or needed. At anchor the batteries would suffice except for one or two charge cycles of an hour or two a day one one of the primary generator sets.

    Now many would argue with a diesel electric more generator sets is preferable due to loading variances. But on a yacht those are less than on a cruise ship. Also, having variable speed generators with conditioned power would allow the output to be tailored to the need.

    Maybe this should be in the diesel electric thread or a new thread (and I might repost in the diesel thread for that reason) but the idea behind this thread was this line of thought!