Maryland Proposed changes for Chesapeake Bay

One has very little to do with the other. Spill cleanup is big money and costs big money. 5 days to clean up a sewage spill is unconscionable. Sounds like someone was trying to find a cheaper way to do it. I've been on enough spills, land and water. The cleanup company should have been on scene within a very few hours. But I DK the details here.
Funny you should mention the Bayliner because in a marina I used to run we had a Bayliner. It was owned by a couple of nickel millionaires who lived on it all summer and never moved. I caught them pumping out several times each summer and they'd just deny it. Nobody took it seriously. I'd have loved to see them hit with a $15,000 fine. Guaranteed those cheap sobs would be paying the pump out boat or be gone.

Like with most laws there is descretion. Like with most there a sledge hammer available. If you feel that the penalties for commercial spills should be increased propose a law, lobby. If you think little pollutors should only face fines that won't bother them or that tax payers should pay to have agents repeatedly going back to slap offenders on the wrist, good luck with that. I'm on the water more than most and I'm not worried about it. Where no discharge zones are and how much the fines are for violations don't concern me. I consider all inside waters no discharge zones and if I screw up I'll pay the price.
Now if you don't mind I'm going to step away from this thread. I think all that's to be said has been.

What they're doing is already illegal, and they can be fined under current law. When you reported it to the police, did they tell you why they did not take it seriously?

And since these guys are already doing something illegal, why do you think banning somebody else from using a Type I MSD will help?

I'm surprised there is even such a thing as a "Y" valve. The other issue could be dirty oily bilges and the issues associated with pumping that nasty water overboard.

I'm aware of a situation where ... a large boat was right at the marina where there was a pump out available ... but instead of using it, they went out in the water a little ways and pumped it all overboard ... 250 gallons or so.

This is a very common attitude.

Of course, the sewage treatment plant on the Potomac River pumps out raw sewage when it rains really hard. ... you can watch 1/2 of the river muddy looking and 1/2 of the river black where the input pipe comes in.

My problem is that it's another example of beating up on the common man while allowing big government and big business (because of their political contributions and power) to run hog wild.

Set one rule for the common man ... make the government exempt from the rules.

Is that a non-reusable tie wrap made of wire, or a non-reusable tie wrap intended to be used on wires, but could be made of nylon? If you use a nylon zip tie, while it's not intended to be reused, it is easily opened with a small pocket knife and reused. However, reusable safety wire such as used for securing bolts is almost never reused once bent and twisted. So which is better, or at least acceptable? Are the wire tie wraps with pressed lead seals such as used to seal shipping containers acceptable? they're made of wire, but not used to wrap wire. What about the wire numbered tags used to lock out our power meters? Are those acceptable? They're non-reusable. If they were used in conjunction with an OSHA-approved lockout-tagout device, would it be acceptable? The handle is not itself secured by a padlock or wire tie, but a wire tie or padlock could be used to secure the lockout-tagout device. This might be more secure than a nylon zip-tie but will it pass muster with the local trout trooper?

I've read the bill about 20 times by now, but with each re-reading, more questions arise to the point where it is now clear as mud. The loopholes are growing, and it will be the larger boats whose owners and their attorneys can afford to jump through them who will be unaffected.

Typical feel-good do-nothing legislation that makes illegal something that was already illegal. Some office schmuck probably spent 10-12 years of his life doing studies and proposing language before this bill came to light as a law. One more law and he retires at 80% on our tax dollars, while we have to suffer his myopia probably forever, or until the next egghead comes along and decides that law just wasn't strict enough, so let's write another.

Why worry about this when you have little ditties like this around:
"Top Craziest Laws Still on the Books
Stephanie Paul - Oct 2007
Motorists take heed: If you ever find yourself driving at night through rural parts of Pennsylvania, state law requires that you stop every mile to send up a rocket signal. It's true. And if you see a skittish team of horses coming toward you, be sure to take your car apart, piece by piece, and hide it under the nearest bushes—unless, of course, you want to be in violation of state law.
Seem implausible? Actually, this absurd Pennsylvania law is technically still on the books."
And we pay these people to write this stuff.

I love it! Next time I'm in PA I'm going to pick up a big box of rockets and drive around at night for a while just to see what happens.

The only problem is there is probably another law that prohibits the launching of rockets within X many feet of a public thoroughfare after sundown. Either that or rockets have been declared illegal fireworks.

Politicians are known for their extended palms, not their intellect, powers of reasoning, memory ("I have no recollection of ...), or knowledge of history beyond who gave them how much for what.

I don't see how that (70%) matters at all, I do see how it can be misleading. The Nitrogen in the Air is N2 while the nitrogen in the discharge is NO2-, NO3-, (NH2)2CO, and NH4OH primarily; the chemicals have very different effects on growth, with N2 doing almost nothing except in the hands of some very specialized cells in very specialized forms of bacteria (specifically amorphic Rhyzobium spp. within root nodules on legumes and a few other plants and crypt cells in blue green algae colonies).

The comparison between boats and cities is a valid one, but just because they aren't fixing a big expensive problem doesn't mean that they shouldn't be fixing a small cheap (relatively) problem. Anyone dumping from their boat in the bay deserves the fines, and maybe that money will pay for the enforcement. The perfect shouldn't be the enemy of the good.

The Y valve has a purpose. From Norfolk to Bermuda is about 650 nautical miles. From Bermuda to the Azores is about 1900. That is a long way between pumpout stations.

Obviously, a 25 foot Bayliner was not designed to make that trip, but there are plenty of boats in Maryland that can.

Again, if you want the existing law enforced, you have to report these things. This is already illegal, so making it illegal for somebody else to do something different (i.e. use a Type I MSD) doesn't help.

I just don't think people would violate if the boat were not designed to do it with the Y valve or in the case of my 54, the ability to pump out the holding tank (into the Ocean or Bay) at will.

And ... the Bertram 54, even though it holds 1400 gallons of fuel, will not make Bermuda. So my boats have no real reason to have a Y valve or pump overboard ability.

It wouldn't be too difficult to have a boat stop at a certified shop where a Y valve would be installed for the purpose of making a major crossing.

Allowing a boat to have a Y valve on board but NOT use it is a little like saying it's ok for people to possess drugs as long as they don't use them.

I'm not sure I understand what a big deal it is to pump out the holding tanks while getting fuel. Do people really have that little respect for the environment?

I don't throw trash out the window. When I walk the dog, I pick up the dogs poop and trash that might be laying around the beautiful community.

So ... I don't get it ... but I can tell you that two very very experienced boaters I know, discharge at will. Kind of like pouring motor oil out in the back yard .. we used to do that as kids.

That's not true. It is legal to pump overboard in international waters. So off of South Florida anything more then 3 miles and you can legally dump your holding tank and most all of the east coast. So that is why it is there. You can also pump overboard in the Bahamas anywhere in ocean waters......

Also I could get your boat to Bermuda with it's 1400 gallons. If you run the boat at 800rpms and run it at cruise for 30mins every 6hrs, you have enough range to troll your way to Bermuda. I'd take another 200 gallons in a bladder tank, but it can be done with plenty of range leftover if done correctly.

That explains why they are going to have a hell of a time stopping a practice that has been the norm. And why my more experienced boating friends don't hesitate at all to pump overboard.

I'll need to try that Bermuda trip sometime

Hopefully they do that 3 miles offshore. SF are a prime examples of why a Y valve. Although they occassionally cruise marina to marina for lunch, more often they're running to the fish with a 1/2 dozen guys, beer and a bunch of food. Many of these boats have a very small holding tank (why waste space on a holding tank where you might stick a bait well). Easy math.

UPDATE on Maryland No Discharge Zone Legislation

Update on Maryland No Discharge Zone Legislation‏

From: David B. Kennedy (dkennedy@boatus.com) on behalf of govtaffairs (govtaffairs@BOATUS.com)
Sent: Wed 3/17/10 2:25 PM


Dear BoatU.S. Member,

You’ve asked for us to keep you up to date on the proposed Maryland No Discharge Zone legislation.

Yesterday, SB513 was heard in the Senate Education, Health, and Environmental Affairs Committee. The hearing was very well attended, with more than 30 people testifying and a full hearing room. We’d like to send our thanks to everyone who shared their thoughts with their Senators ahead of the hearing and those who gave up a beautiful Tuesday afternoon to show up in Annapolis. Those boaters who spoke did a great job of telling their story, and what they thought of the bill. The committee members were given a wide array of information from the witnesses, and now they have much to think about.

The Committee Chair spoke of proposed Amendments to the bill that would give the commercial sector more time to comply, and lower the fine. However, these don’t appear to have been written yet, so we can’t confirm exactly what is under consideration.

On Friday afternoon the companion bill HB 1257 will be heard in the House Environmental Matters Committee. We encourage boaters to show up and let this Committee also understand your perspectives. Keep in mind that unlike Tuesday, we expect Friday’s hearing to be run with strict time limits on testimony of 3 minutes or less. Submit your full thoughts in writing, but if you will be testifying be ready to summarize your thoughts efficiently.

Details for Friday’s hearing:

* Room 250, House Office Building, Annapolis, MD 21401
* Start time is scheduled for 1:00 pm.
* Anyone wishing to testify must sign the witness register before the hearing begins. If you are submitting written testimony you must submit 40 copies to the committee staff for distribution one hour prior to the hearing.
* The Committee’s web site is: http://mlis.state.md.us/2010rs/hearsch/0304_env.htm
* Map of the House Office Building Location: http://maps.google.com/maps?q=38.98...8.98035,-76.492047&spn=0.002932,0.004812&z=18

The time and place of the hearing can change up until the last minute, so check the state website again before driving to Annapolis!

Margaret Podlich
VP Government Affairs
BoatU.S.
703-823-9550 x8355
Govtaffairs@boatus.com

http://www.dbw.ca.gov/Environmental/pumpinfo/Default.aspx
http://www.sfestuary.org/pages/index.php?ID=14
Try Google search. And BYW cap, it's "offshore" not "from shore". The difference being the 3 mile limit. You won't find that in a bay.