Click for Abeking Click for Abeking Click for Burger Click for Walker Click for Burger

If we decide on a faster 5 stateroom boat...

Discussion in 'General Yachting Discussion' started by FlyingGolfer, May 20, 2020.

You need to be registered and signed in to view this content.
  1. cnvsback

    cnvsback Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2009
    Messages:
    56
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    Overmarine
  2. cnvsback

    cnvsback Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2009
    Messages:
    56
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    Yes I can think of a few instances
  3. FlyingGolfer

    FlyingGolfer Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2017
    Messages:
    214
    Location:
    NC
    Fun to have access to all these expert opinions. Cheers!
  4. Capt J

    Capt J Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,530
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    Why not buy a 130' Westport to live on and a 63' Pershing that travels with it. Far more versatile. For example you can base the Westport somewhere in the exumas and easily use the Pershing to travel 50NM each way to explore for day trips.
  5. mapism

    mapism Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    2,167
    Location:
    Sardinia
    You mean a P62, I suppose?
    Great boat and pretty fast, but for speedy day cruises, I'd rather sacrifice interior spaces a bit further and go for an even quicker Otam 58.
    Or for much more room, on top of a Fabio Buzzi hull with a record heritage second to none, also an Otam 80.
    Anyhow, with the option of a second "toy boat" mostly meant for adrenaline rushes, there's plenty of choices. Also much more extreme, going down in size a bit: some 50 footers like the SV Outerlimits or the Marauder are in a totally different league, in terms of speed...

    Personally, I'm more a follower of the principle "two engines, two problems", let alone two boats!
    So, if speed is a requirement, I'd rather go for the Pershing 140 (as a best compromise between speed and interior spaces), or the AB 140 as a close second, and call it a day. But that's me.

    In any case, the differences between the alternatives that we are debating are so radical, that before talking of brands and models, the OP should make up his mind on the type of boating that he's more interested in, first and foremost.
    Jumping in conclusions is never a good idea, with boats...
  6. wdrzal

    wdrzal Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2006
    Messages:
    414
    Location:
    Allegheny Mountains of Western Pa
    Hull speed in knots equals 1.34 times the square root of the waterline length in feet (HS = 1.34 x √LWL). I always thought this was the reason for longer & longer yacht hulls. You gain speed ,room & keep fuel flow down.
  7. olderboater

    olderboater Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2013
    Messages:
    7,130
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    You're saying spend millions extra at purchase and many thousands extra on every aspect of operation to save a little fuel and run a slightly faster hull speed?
  8. wdrzal

    wdrzal Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2006
    Messages:
    414
    Location:
    Allegheny Mountains of Western Pa
    No, just pointing out the fact what hull speed is. I'm with you, 10 knots is to slow for me. Would like 30 to 40 but can live with 20. A longer boat is the way if you can afford silly money. You just keep your 50 foot twine turbine on board for the adrenaline rush .
  9. Capt J

    Capt J Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,530
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    That's the formula for displacement hulls. The yachts we're talking about here aren't displacement hulls, so the formula doesn't apply. You can always run a planing hull or semi displacement hull slow, like the Westport at 10 or 12 knots and get virtually the same fuel economy as a displacement hull.......(and 9 out of 10 of them generally do travel at 12 knots).
  10. GhostriderIII

    GhostriderIII Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2015
    Messages:
    350
    Location:
    Newfoundland
    37m Incat Crowther with twin C32's - top speed 25kts and no one will spill a drink in heavy seas. Saw one going thru the CZ a month ago. A very comfortable 5 cabin model, drafting 2m
  11. FlyingGolfer

    FlyingGolfer Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2017
    Messages:
    214
    Location:
    NC
    Second boat for speed sounds about right, if we decide we want to go fast sometimes. That Pershing 62 really moves.
  12. olderboater

    olderboater Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2013
    Messages:
    7,130
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    Yes it does. It runs 48 knots WOT, 40 knots cruise so about 5 knots faster cruise than a 63' Riva. AB's 64 is/was faster. I say is/was as they've removed it from their website, although I'm sure they'd still build one of anything right now. They do have a 787 center console like boat they've added though.
  13. mapism

    mapism Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    2,167
    Location:
    Sardinia
    Indeed.
    But if you are now oriented towards that combo, you won't regret giving a look also at the Otam 58.
    Aside from being even faster, she can also take worse sea conditions in her stride, at any given speed.
    The Pershing interiors are better and larger, though.
  14. FlyingGolfer

    FlyingGolfer Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2017
    Messages:
    214
    Location:
    NC
    So many choices! The mind boggles.
  15. FlyingGolfer

    FlyingGolfer Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2017
    Messages:
    214
    Location:
    NC
    Not fast enough, but it seems to be amazingly smooth riding.
  16. GhostriderIII

    GhostriderIII Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2015
    Messages:
    350
    Location:
    Newfoundland
    Then you're looking at HSC or turbine powered trimarans. Outside of this one with twin 1850hp helo engines it doesn't get good until 3:16
  17. MBevins

    MBevins Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2008
    Messages:
    1,225
    Location:
    Windsor On. Canada
    My neighbor had one similar with twin turbines. Eventually sold it when he couldn't get the speed he was trying to hit. ( North of the 116 this one showed) .
    It was truly a beast.
  18. wdrzal

    wdrzal Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2006
    Messages:
    414
    Location:
    Allegheny Mountains of Western Pa
    12 minutes running the gamut of speed. Ps: Don't assume that what's available now, oars, sails, props and pumps are the only way to move a boat.

    <iframe width="1527" height="861" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/CyR4EXaTud0" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

    Don't know why this video didn't embed. will edit and try again.
    Last edited: May 22, 2020
  19. Capt J

    Capt J Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,530
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    He also probably sold it because turbines are VERY undriveable around marinas and such.