That's a sad way to go, to have a porthole put underwater by a concentration of heavy guests. Is that really what happened?
But at least it has an extension! ;)
You were probably given the benefit of the doubt for a simple typo. That won't always happen.:D
I'm not talking about moving the vessel. It takes a propulsive force of some kind to move a vessel forward. One cannot move a vessel forward by...
I think he wanted a measurement of the resistance, rather than the voltage stepdown.
So the one part of the boat that, by definition, could not move any farther forward, is now farther forward, even though it did not move? How can...
Irrespective of the science of all this, I just cannot understand why someone doesn't get that if you take a measurement (or to say it more...
I think this comment clarifies so many things, on so many different levels.
The juxtaposition of those two thoughts is more irony than I can stand.
What I find most interesting about the last clip is that there appears to be no communication, verbal or otherwise, amongst the crew.
You are correct in that it is very simple. And both of your conclusions are correct. Which is why both Marmot and AMG are right, within their...
Simple typo. I am not in the habit of retreating from my published positions, which is why I press so hard when others do. Not educated in...
And before you or someone else points out the obvious, 10+10=20 in all bases >2 and <11. Which kind of makes my point from the opposite angle -...
Simple typo, yet I'm absolutely certain that it will negate my primary point completely in the eyes of many. For those that believe, no...
Capt. J - If AMG deserves the reputation he seems to have in the industry, I don't think he needs someone else purporting to know "what he means"...
Then I understand completely. The result will be whatever it needs to be. The measurement is made from one point in one version of the vessel,...
And that doesn't sound like an answer, but like a dodge, much like the "I'm not saying the NA gave the wrong answers, but that you asked the wrong...
No sir, you have never addressed my specific question, so I'll rephrase it and ask again: In post 60, you state "OK, but your station '0' does...
AMG - any chance I can get an answer to the question I posed to you in post #63?
This adds to my sense that you guys are not actually disagreeing, when the reference point (or definition, perhaps) is taken into account.