Click for Walker Click for Ocean Alexander Click for Perko Click for Mulder Click for Mulder

Why did the Bounty sink? Continued...

Discussion in 'General Yachting Discussion' started by Marmot, Jun 15, 2014.

You need to be registered and signed in to view this content.
  1. Marmot

    Marmot Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2007
    Messages:
    3,311
    Location:
    9114 S. Central Ave
    Admin Edit: This thread is a continuation of a closed thread, located here...

    http://www.yachtforums.com/forums/general-yachting-discussion/19850-why-did-bounty-sink.html

    ***

    Let's try one more time to have a discussion on the investigation. The findings include operational and philosophical considerations that apply to everyone who leaves the dock whether as master, crew, passenger, or guest.

    The lessons learned are too valuable to waste ...

    Sinking of Tall Ship Bounty NTSB/MAB-14/03


    "It was an end to a voyage that should not have been attempted. To set sail into an approaching hurricane introduced needless risk."

    "Further, most of the crewmembers were inexperienced and their complement was smaller than usual."

    "In addition, despite the fact that the Bounty took on water even in good conditions―and that wood rot had been discovered during the shipyard period―the captain gave no order to ensure that all onboard pumps were fully operational before departing, even though he knew that the vessel was sure to encounter rough seas during the voyage"

    "This failure on his part further compromised the safety of everyone on board.Finally, the vessel organization did nothing to dissuade the captain from sailing."

    Probable Cause

    "The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable cause of the sinking of tall ship Bounty was the captain’s reckless decision to sail the vessel into the well-forecasted path of Hurricane Sandy, which subjected the aging vessel and the inexperienced crew to conditions from which the vessel could not recover."

    "Contributing to the sinking was the lack of effective safety oversight by the vessel organization."
  2. Capt J

    Capt J Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,533
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    I think the biggest problem I have seen in many cases, on many ships, and yachts, is a Captain that has been a Captain either on that yacht or others for a long period of time gets complacent after so many years. Also a Captain on a yacht a long time such as the Bounty can get dellusional about the vessel's real condition and they fail to believe how much wood rot there really is or figure it's not that bad because they've been running the same vessel for 17 years and have gotten away with it.
  3. Marmot

    Marmot Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2007
    Messages:
    3,311
    Location:
    9114 S. Central Ave
    Along with complacency is the "God complex" inherent in some of those people. That is the reason for safety management systems that are rooted in the owners or managers of vessels like that.

    "No matter how interested individual employees might be, or what assistance a manufacturer offers, or how insistent a certificating authority might be—none of these factors will have a significant effect on safety without support from top management."

    — John O'Brian, ALPA's Engineering and Air Safety Department.

    "Safety begins in the boardroom."

    — James L. Oberstar, member U.S. House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee

    When a captain places pleasing his employers above the safety of his passengers or crew, and even his own, the only firewall remaining is an employer (manager) who will acknowledge the danger in that behavior.

    The problem faced by the yacht industry is that manufacturers have no interest post delivery, regulators are rarely involved even post accident, and the zero to hero culture does not require any lengthy period of supervision or tutelage. Many of those in command have never been commanded.

    Leadership is learned by being lead, judgement is learned (in part) by observing the results of bad judgement. The Bounty survivors learned a lesson in judgement that their captain repeatedly missed for all the years he operated that vessel without oversight or question.
  4. SomeTexan

    SomeTexan Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    190
    Location:
    Texas, landlocked for a bit longer...
    I think the captain was desperate. The company's major asset was the ship, and it was falling apart. The little money they made, plus donations wasn't enough to maintain the ship, let alone repair years of neglect. The captain was used to being a "god" over an amateur crew. If that boat went away, so did the life he knew. Imagine this guy getting a job on another ship. From ruler to servant for a demanding yacht owner. How long before an experienced crew decided he was a narcissist or a doddering fool? No, he chose to risk his life, and the lives of a bunch of brainwashed newbies so that he could continue being the master of his own ship, rather than a "retired pirate" attraction on someone else's ship. Every move the Bounty made was life or death for him. One missed money farm was one step closer to him wandering the docks with his arms full of wood offering to sell people historic maritime artifacts...
  5. Marmot

    Marmot Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2007
    Messages:
    3,311
    Location:
    9114 S. Central Ave
    You have probably nailed it. I believe the root cause of this was the captain's psychological makeup. Narcissism was probably a very large part of his emotional condition and what lead to his making decisions that, even had the outcome been successful, benefited nothing other than his carefully managed image.

    Among the many chilling findings in the reports is in the NTSB report quoted earlier.

    "In addition, despite the fact that the Bounty took on water even in good conditions―and that wood rot had been discovered during the shipyard period―the captain gave no order to ensure that all onboard pumps were fully operational before departing, even though he knew that the vessel was sure to encounter rough seas during the voyage"

    The reasons why defy reason and leave me wondering if, as you posit, he knew the end of his reign was near and this was his Götterdämmerung.

    The horror of this story is that no one in the final hours before departing New London walked off that boat. I think it was more a cult than a crew. There is an aspect of the tallship lifestyle that attracts followers who do not become the best leaders. Bounty is the poster boat for the failure of leadership and management at every level.
  6. olderboater

    olderboater Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2013
    Messages:
    7,130
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    He had also previously stated thoughts about dying in an event such as this at sea, almost idealizing that as the way he'd want to go and pictured himself going, challenging weather that others wouldn't at sea.
  7. SomeTexan

    SomeTexan Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    190
    Location:
    Texas, landlocked for a bit longer...
    I agree Marmot, why did they all stay with the ship? Ignorant or brainwashed into thinking taking on thousands of gallons of water a day was normal. Or, my favorite, "y'all go to Home Depot and buy dap." That's the right way to fix a boat... No one even thought that might not be the proper method of wood repair. The crew was brainwashed or chosen because they didn't know better and would believe anything they were told. I do sincerely hope that those people are never allowed on a boat again, or even allowed to own a rowboat.

    To a point, I think the crew should be punished. If they all did a few years behind bars for accessory, and if their pictures were posted all over the docks with the words "not welcome at any marina" under the pics, I'm sure that would encourage potential deckhands to do some research before jumping on a boat. At least the first mate should do some time, had he done his job, the whole crew would have jumped ship.
  8. Chasm

    Chasm Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2013
    Messages:
    137
    Location:
    Germany
    This.
    For me this incident is mostly a reminder that there is always the chance, even necessity, to remove yourself from a dangerous situation.
    Final responsibility of superiors is nice and dandy but does not help me (be that as pax, crew or whatever else) in a situation that I judge as dangerous and unsustainable.

    Now how to come to that conclusion is obviously an issue. That there will be consequences, esp. if you are right, is also true. But once the realization has been made that its time to punch out, its time to punch out.
  9. Marmot

    Marmot Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2007
    Messages:
    3,311
    Location:
    9114 S. Central Ave
    All of the above and bound together by peer pressure, probably. Most of the crew had spent a fair amount of time on the boat together and there would have been a strong bond formed under the leadership of a charismatic figure. The new crew probably thought that if the old timers were OK with the decision to go then who were they to question it.

    I see that pre-departure meeting around the capstain as a scene directly out of the many movies where the squadron, team, crew, or platoon, makes the decision to go out in glory together. It was a lovely bit of theater that reinforced the image of a Dana-esque adventure under sail. They were going to challenge the sea under a master who laughed in the face of hurricanes.
    Besides, they knew that adventurous young people don't really die in terror, they are immortal.

    I think they have been well and truly punished for what they knew but didn't act on, for following a cult leader, and for believing they were immortal.

    I tend to agree that the mate was derelict and should have his license revoked or at least suspended. The mate held a license and a position of responsibility and authority that, if he acted on the knowledge he had of the boat's condition, the lack of preparedness (no testing of dewatering equipment), and the weather conditions, he could have saved Claudine's life.

    He could have ended that Wagnerian farce by simply walking ashore. He probably would have been followed by many others who only needed someone to validate their own concerns.
  10. Capt Ralph

    Capt Ralph Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2004
    Messages:
    13,443
    Location:
    Satsuma, FL
    A lil voice has been haunting me for a while and it finally came to words.

    Another thought;
    Some marinas and docks have a slip rental clause that you must move when a named storm is approaching. I am not familiar at all with the northern docks and how they operate, could Bounty have been asked to leave?
    I remember putting Puerto Rico and Charleston SC back together after Hugo. Boats, ships and barges blown well inland. Some still in place. Bounty would have been a cork in a tub if mored out and probably sunk, if not blown inland, anyway.

    Not defending the captain, but I don't remember any comment about or from the dock. Also, The owners and management have been real quiet (unlike folks involved in the NM bust).
  11. olderboater

    olderboater Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2013
    Messages:
    7,130
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    No, not asked to leave. And no reason to hurry either. Had plenty of time to wait for the storm to clear and still reach their destination in time.
  12. Marmot

    Marmot Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2007
    Messages:
    3,311
    Location:
    9114 S. Central Ave
    Can't help but to think that if there were any reason other than captain's decision to go chase a hurricane it would have been used to help justify that decision.

    What is the worst that could have happened if they stayed at the dock? Holed by a piling and sunk in 15 feet of water?
  13. Capt J

    Capt J Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,533
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    It would have been salvagable and most likely rebuildable in the worst case scenario and a life wouldn't have been lost as well as countless lives endangered including those of the USCG. Nobody really thinks about the huge effort the USCG (both in expense and risk) takes on in events like this and the young guys that put their lives on the line to make it all happen. Tied to a strong dock would have been the best choice, or hauled out at a boat yard. Anchored deep in the Chesapeke Bay would've been a far better choice. Anything would've been a better choice.

    Right now, the Bounty is permanently lost.