Click for Ocean Alexander Click for JetForums Click for Walker Click for YF Listing Service Click for Westport

What caused "The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald?"

Discussion in 'YachtForums Yacht Club' started by brian eiland, Nov 14, 2015.

  1. brian eiland

    brian eiland Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2004
    Messages:
    2,981
    Location:
    St Augustine, Fl and Thailand
    What caused "The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald?"

    by Bob Henneman
    Updated 21 October 2001

    Although the wreck was discovered and surveyed several years ago, the causes of the sinking of the ore carrier Edmund Fitzgerald were not solved until recently. The wreck was extensively investigated by remote cameras in the last year or so by members of the National Transportation Safety Board (yes, they do ship wrecks as well as planes and trains). They solved the mystery of her loss quite easily.

    The ship was carrying taconite, a type of small iron ore pellets. These pellets are porous, so a cargo of them will easily absorb water and gain weight at an incredible rate if they are allowed to get wet. The wreck of the ship was found, as expected, with her cargo dumped out. Ore carriers usually capsize when they sink, unless the water is too shallow to allow them to roll over. They flip, dump the heavy cargo, and then roll back upright from the residual buoyancy in the hull. The weight of the cargo made the ship flip over, dumping the taconite out the hatch covers. Once free of the cargo, the ship then at least partially righted herself, struck the bottom bow-first and broke in half. The front half settled upright, the stern is upside down.

    The clue that gave away the cause of the sinking was the clamps that hold down the hatch covers. They are universally missing from wrecked ore carriers, as they are ripped off with the hatch covers by the weight of the cargo as the ship flips. In the case of the Edmund Fitzgerald, the clamps were not only still on the ship, but they were in perfect condition, even though the hatch covers were gone. The obvious conclusion from this finding is that the clamps were not securing the hatch covers when the ship sank but were instead left unlocked.

    Ore carriers sit very low in the water when filled to capacity and, in a gale, water often washes over the main deck. With the hatch covers not secured (remember, the ship left port in clear weather and the storm blew up rather quickly), the waves breaking over the Edmund Fitzgerald saturated the cargo. As the cargo got heavier and heavier, the ship sank lower and lower. The now dangerously overloaded ship, without a bit of reserve buoyancy, was hit by a large wave (reported by a nearby vessel that was also hit by it), and the vessel was swamped. She sank like a rock. It is hard to accept that the crew did not notice the vessel becoming waterlogged and sinking, but this is a fairly common occurrence in bad weather. Without a steady waterline to go by, no one on board notices the gradual settling of the vessel.

    What prompted the reassessment of the sinking is that a few years back the Atlantic Gypsum Conveyor, a conveyer ship full of gypsum, was sailing up the East Coast. A conveyer ship is similar to a tanker, but with onboard conveyer belts below the main deck to self-load dry cargo like chalk, gypsum, talc, etc. A door at the side of the stern allows the ship to offload herself to train cars or hoppers on the dock. The crew of this particular conveyor ship had failed to properly secure this door. In only slightly rough seas, each wave dumped a little more water into the conveyer passage and on into the holds. The gypsum quickly absorbed it, thus becoming very heavy. A Coast Guard plane happened by, and noticed that the ship was very low in the water. It started to video tape the ship, and radioed the crew to offer assistance. The crew responded, basically saying "Help? Why would we need help? Things couldn't be better." The Coast Guard pointed out that the ship was about to sink, which the ship's master did not believe until it was too late. About 10 minutes later the ship dipped her bows into a trough, and never came back up. She rolled over and was on the bottom of the ocean inside of a minute. I don't recall the number of casualties. Had that Coast Guard plane not happened along and alerted the captain and crew, they might have all disappeared without a trace, creating yet another mysterious ship loss.

    As a result of this incident, the NTSB decided to re-examine the Edmund Fitzgerald with new video technology which was not available the last time they looked at her wreck. The NTSB also had the Coast Guard revoke the operating certificate of the conveyer ship's sistership until the door was modified to prevent a repeat accident.
  2. NYCAP123

    NYCAP123 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Messages:
    11,208
    Location:
    Long Island, NY
    Hadn't heard that. My understanding was that he Edmund Fitzgerald was thought to have risen on that wave and broken in half due to the normal weight of its cargo. Makes one wonder why a captain wouldn't dog the hatches no matter what weather they anticipated, especially considering Lk. Superior's reputation. Not like it's a big / time consuming task. More proof of the "weak link" theory, and the need to watch the details. It's generally not the big things that'll sink you. It's that little thing that you think isn't important enough to worry about.
  3. Beau

    Beau Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2010
    Messages:
    2,261
    Location:
    Beaufort, NC
    From what I have read on the sinking, the captain reported snotty conditions, but did not report that he was taking on water or slowly sinking. I don't believe there is any radio traffic that supports that?

    The theory I've read is that the ship may have touched bottom in a shoal area it passed and then, weakened, it split in two when it was lofted by waves and unequally supported along its length.
  4. NYCAP123

    NYCAP123 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Messages:
    11,208
    Location:
    Long Island, NY
    Not snotty conditions, but a full on gale (which on Superior gets way past snotty), but the two theories actually work together. Whether she weakened by touching bottom, broke apart from just the weight of the cargo as her bow was lifted or the weight was extra heavy due to the cargo being wetted, it all works. Obviously the hatches weren't dogged per what was found, and the never to be answered question is why.
  5. Capt Ralph

    Capt Ralph Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2004
    Messages:
    13,498
    Location:
    Satsuma, FL
    That's what I understood. However, I can not quote the source after the years since reading.
  6. Capt J

    Capt J Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,540
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    Complacency. It takes time to go around and dog every one of them. It was cold too wasn't it? Maybe some were frozen, I don't know.....but it was a calm, clear, day and they were probably too lazy to do it. Then it got rough real quick and was too cold and dangerous to do it.