Click for Perko Click for Ocean Alexander Click for Mag Bay Click for Comfort Click for Abeking

Sat Compass

Discussion in 'Electronics' started by Marblehead01945, Nov 12, 2021.

You need to be registered and signed in to view this content.
  1. Marblehead01945

    Marblehead01945 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Messages:
    103
    Location:
    Marblehead
    as long as we're talking about newer technology, is anyone using these fairly new Sat Compasses as their primary compass feeding their plotters etc? We have so many different compasses available to us that I'm wondering where this stacks up for use at this point in time. Now we have Magnetic, Gyro, Fluxgate and Sat. and probably something I'm not remembering.
  2. Capt Ralph

    Capt Ralph Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2004
    Messages:
    12,649
    Location:
    Satsuma, FL
    My understanding; you have to be moving and you get the direction you are traveling.
    Not the way you are pointing.
    Course over ground, I think is the term that still applies.

    For lots of reasons, nothing beats an Ole Mag Compass.
  3. mapism

    mapism Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    2,111
    Location:
    Sardinia
    I don't think that's correct, CR.
    I'm aware of some Furuno stuff capable of giving the vessel heading (i.e., not the COG, which you can get with any plain vanilla GPS, mobile phones included) within a 1 degree accuracy at zero speed, and 0.4 while under way. Not to mention that they can also provide pitch and roll in real time.
    Pretty impressive instruments.

    Now, if you ask me if I'm rushing to spend 2k$ or so for replacing my mag compass, my personal answer is of course not.
    But it's just small change in the grand scheme of some modern electronic suites...
    Last edited: Nov 13, 2021
  4. Capt Ralph

    Capt Ralph Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2004
    Messages:
    12,649
    Location:
    Satsuma, FL
    I'm Game, Less two receivers on board, somebody please explain to us (me) how this mess works.

    BTW, My cell phone has a compass in it. But it's still fluxgate, not sat driven.
  5. Pascal

    Pascal Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2008
    Messages:
    8,120
    Location:
    Miami, FL
    GPS can only the supply position of the receiver. Well... it’s antenna. Unless you have two receivers with antennas mounted far apart I really don’t see how it can give you a heading while not moving. Antenna would have to be apart enough for the combined error not to become irrelevant.
  6. mapism

    mapism Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    2,111
    Location:
    Sardinia
    Someone with a higher pay grade than myself will surely be able to give you more details, but essentially the principle is that there are at least two (or more, I believe 4 in the more sophisticated units) GPS receivers inside the sat compass radome, which must be precisely positioned along the longitudinal axis of the vessel.
    And due to the internal distance between them (which is obviously known and very accurately calibrated), there is a very tiny difference in the sat wavelength that each of them receive. On that basis, the internal processor can determine the exact radome (hence vessel) heading.

    Ref. cellphones, I was not referring to the sort of fluxgate that most of them have these days, and which can give you a ballpark heading (of the cellphone itself, and good luck in placing it exactly aligned with the boat), but nowhere near as accurate as any sat compass, obviously.
    I mentioned the COG because any gps app, as soon as (and only as long as) you are moving, can calculate your COG - with a quite good accuracy, in fact.
    And they can do that regardles of whether you are walking, driving, boating, or whatever.
  7. mapism

    mapism Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    2,111
    Location:
    Sardinia
    Your "unless" is precisely how a sat compass works, except the "far apart" bit - see my previous post.
    In fact, the really impressive bit is that they can do that also with receivers placed inside a pretty small (25" or so) radome, hence with a distance which by gut feeling nobody in his right mind would expect to be enough for a decent accuracy - but it is!
  8. Capt Ralph

    Capt Ralph Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2004
    Messages:
    12,649
    Location:
    Satsuma, FL
    When GPS precision is still one meter on a good day, I don't see 25" or so working well.
    But, your description of how it works would be the theory, I assume.

    Let me ask an other question, The Merc and VP Dynamic Positioning System uses fluxgate or sat compass?
    Last edited: Nov 13, 2021
  9. mapism

    mapism Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    2,111
    Location:
    Sardinia
    Sorry, can't answer your last question.
    Those gizmos never interested me enough to bother understanding them.

    Ref. GPS accuracy, I did see your skepticism coming! :)
    I believe that positioning accuracy doesn't have much to see with the sat compass logic, which is only aimed at identifying the relative, not the absolute position.
    I mean, whenever one antenna receives a clear signal from one satellite, obviously also any other antenna nearby gets the very same signal.
    And a computation of the difference in the same signal between each antenna is sufficient to determine the heading (as well as pitch and roll, as I said) with extreme accuracy, regardless of whether you are within one or one hundred meters from where your plotter says you are.
    Last edited: Nov 13, 2021
  10. Capt Ralph

    Capt Ralph Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2004
    Messages:
    12,649
    Location:
    Satsuma, FL
    Yep.
    Thanks for trying to explain it.
    Still going to keep and trust my BA Danforth compasses and bearing tools.
  11. Marblehead01945

    Marblehead01945 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Messages:
    103
    Location:
    Marblehead
    For me ,the issue is having a compass accurately talk nice with the other electronics we have, the plotter and the radar- which a magnetic compass will not- in fact, as I think about the magnetic compass a bit, I have not used it in several years. Nice to have when the power goes out but at that point I think I may have more pressing things to sort. Still researching....
  12. mapism

    mapism Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    2,111
    Location:
    Sardinia
    Agreed, I can't actually remember to have ever used the mag compass, but it does look nice in the p/house!
  13. Capt Ralph

    Capt Ralph Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2004
    Messages:
    12,649
    Location:
    Satsuma, FL
    Have a few fluxgate compasses on board for the stuff to use. Ah yes, I luv APs and radar over chart displays.
    I also have a computer screens or TVs on board that can show real time chart data while cruising or at anchor.
    But I luv to just look over the helm compass and pick out a mag bearing. Something about just watching that card hold steady or swing in a turn to help feel a part with the ship.
    And when it is rough off shore, that card will remind you how bad and help find more comfortable heading.

    I ask my stepson to shoot hand bearing lines sometimes on coastal runs and compare his DR to the displays.
    Darn kid has gotten pretty good at it.
    My father trained me the same way long before todays stuff & gizmos.

    All this compass text has me wondering, Been over 10 years ago since my last compass check up. May be time again.
  14. mapism

    mapism Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    2,111
    Location:
    Sardinia
    Do you? Interesting.
    The MFDs of my current boat (and of a few others which I helmed) do allow overlay, but I never use it. Just a matter of habit I suppose, but I'm so used to keep the radar head up and charts N up, that I find overlay confusing - as long as you can keep radar and charts in two screens in parallel, of course.
    In fact, I even wondered if Marblehead didn't actually mean "plotter and AP", rather than "plotter and radar".
    When used head up, obviously the radar doesn't need any heading signal.
  15. Pascal

    Pascal Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2008
    Messages:
    8,120
    Location:
    Miami, FL
    I never use radar overlay either. Hate it. Don’t see the point. :).

    Oh and I always set my plotters North up! I get confused if course up.
  16. mapism

    mapism Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    2,111
    Location:
    Sardinia
    Well, great minds think alike, as the old saying goes! :)
    I'm so used to looking at and working with N up oriented maps, that I keep them that way also in my car navsystem.
    Actually, I see the point of head up orientation while driving, particularly when approaching complicated junctions.
    But I have a small window that pops up automatically for that purpose, so I prefer to keep the map N up, for an overall view.
  17. MBevins

    MBevins Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2008
    Messages:
    1,162
    Location:
    Windsor On. Canada
    That would be an interesting poll to take. What orientation do you use on your plotter while moving?

    I use course up while moving and obviously North up for "preflight" course creation.
  18. Capt Ralph

    Capt Ralph Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2004
    Messages:
    12,649
    Location:
    Satsuma, FL
    Running the upper St Johns river with its twist and turns, I find heads up charting much easier on my main screen.
    Elsewhere, during the day, most in north up.
    I may leave the main screen in heads up then.
    At night, all my play toys are off, but one PC screen in night vision mode and very dim. That is when heads up chart with radar and AIS overlay works very well for me.
  19. rtrafford

    rtrafford Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2019
    Messages:
    1,579
    Location:
    Vero Beach
    Not certain if sarcastic or not....but I'll go on record that North-Up simply suits the way my mind works. I had a shift prior this last run switch to Head-Up as it seemed to help him navigate more like a video game...but when I came back to the helm I quickly switched it back and was able to regain my composure quickly. On one hand I can see the different methods for differing minds, but it is a strange occurrence to discover.

    As far as radar/chart overlay, again, I use it. Primary gain from the function is to locate targets on radar I am tracking at sea during a night watch. It helps to understand what it is I might be seeing on radar as well as what they might be doing out there...such as seeing that a radar target is actually a distant sea buoy, or that a vessel seemingly not on one course is near a reef, therefore most likely a fishing boat. Little tricks that can put pieces into context. I don't find that I pay attention to these overlays during daytime or inland runs, just more often relative to nights and offshore. Doppler weather overlays also can help predict what's ahead in relation to interaction of weather and land.
  20. rtrafford

    rtrafford Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2019
    Messages:
    1,579
    Location:
    Vero Beach
    Yes, I could see the point of my crew when we were running inside through the maze of markers and shoaling. Thank goodness for Aqua Maps as well as flood tides. But the heads-up allowed them to reference the chart nav path while the second was scanning for markers in the night with the spot. I can see their logic, but I am simply accustomed to North up running. It works for my brain.

    We certainly go dim at night, but we still use all of the tools available. When offshore, we may use it all even more heavily, including thermal camera views.