Click for Mulder Click for Ocean Alexander Click for Abeking Click for Furuno Click for Westport

Safe low rpm for Engines

Discussion in 'Engines' started by Longranger5, Jan 16, 2010.

You need to be registered and signed in to view this content.
  1. Longranger5

    Longranger5 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2009
    Messages:
    13
    Location:
    Asia
    Hi,

    I am looking at buying a yacht which can go 2000nm to 3000nm. Most of the listings i have seen mention that at economical speed to 10-13 knts(around 1100 rpm), they can go even upto 3500 nm, whereas at cruising speed of around 18 knots( around 1800 rpm), range is around 2000 or less.

    One captain told me that his yacht is not safe to run below 1800 rpm at 18 knots since the turbo charger stops below that speed. At 1800 rpm, range is at 900 nm, then logically at 1100 rpm, it should be close to 2000nm.

    Is it safe for the engines to run on a low rpm for long distances? How does one know at which speed the turbo charger comes on? I now this varies for each size and make of engine, but is there a standard formula followed?

    For most displacement yachts, the difference between max speed and economical speed is not too much and so looks easy to understand, but for semi-displacement yachts, there seems to be a big difference which makes it difficult to understand.

    Thanks in advance.
  2. Marmot

    Marmot Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2007
    Messages:
    3,311
    Location:
    9114 S. Central Ave
    I suggest that if anything makes that yacht unsafe it might be the captain.

    The turbo does not "stop" and the output of a turbocharger is related to engine load, not rpm. If he can maintain 18 knots while reducing rpm he has a planing hull, a magic boat, or is operating well beyond hull speed in which case reducing rpm would be good for the engine which is probably well and truly overloaded.

    You should obtain the engine manufacturer's data on engine output vs rpm to determine the performance you should expect. Each engine maker publishes a performance chart based on the use of a "well matched" fixed pitch propeller. This chart will tell you how much horsepower the prop absorbs at a given rpm and tells you the fuel consumption at each point. The chart has data points for operations within the manufacturer's acceptable range.

    As far as the actual speed and range of the vessel in which the engine is installed, that is a whole 'nuther animal that only sea trials and operational history can determine.
  3. Pascal

    Pascal Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2008
    Messages:
    8,543
    Location:
    Miami, FL
    agreed, waht that captain said doesnt' make a lot of sense.

    the critical thing when running a planning hull at displacement speed is to make sure that the engines still operate a the correct temperature. While you dont' want to run at idle all day, usually running at or near hull speed will keep the engines warm enough.

    most mechanics and diesel specialists also recommend running the boat at higher speed, on plane, for 15 to 20 minutes at the end of long slow day, when possible.

    i've run many boats at hull speed, never had an issue.

    as marmot said, turbos gradually develop boost as load (adn RPM) increase. for instance on the cat 3412Es (1400hp) i'm familiar with, boost start increasing as you go past hull speed and about 1100rpm on that specific boat.

    indeed range increases dramatically if you run slower, it's a good option on long runs where speed isnt' critical
  4. Longranger5

    Longranger5 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2009
    Messages:
    13
    Location:
    Asia
    Thanks Marmot and Pascal for your input.

    Is it ok to run for long distances at low speed where the turbo charger doesn't come on? I've heard that the turbo charger is not lubricated enough and will get damaged.

    I have heard that once every few hours or every hour(if the engine is high-tech or electronically controlled), it is necessary to bring engine upto full speed to pump out the carbon and unburnt fuel. If you do that, is it ok to run the engine at low speed for long distances?
  5. Henning

    Henning Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    940
    Location:
    Ft Lauderdale FL
    I've heard that man came to Earth on spaceships too... doesn't make it true.
  6. K1W1

    K1W1 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2005
    Messages:
    7,427
    Location:
    My Office
    Hi,

    The turbo is fed on high speed diesels by the full Oil Pressure of the engine.

    On a High Tech/Electronically Controled Engine the amount of unburnt fuel and other gunge that builds up in the cylinders of a low tech mechanically controlled engine is a lot less but it still doesn't hurt to give them a run once or twice a day if running 24 Hrs a day to clear them out.

    If it is real range you are looking at and are not too worried about the cruising speed you could do a few trials running on one engine with the other shaft freewheeling. If you are going to do this for long periods there is some lube needed for the g/box but it should be ok for a few hours at a time as is.

    You should not achieve full revs on the one engine and should be aware of exh temps etc if it's a mechanically controlled one as it is easy to overload one.

    I went around the world on a 55m Yacht with a pair of 3512'S in her. These were Mechanical Unit Injectors so it was a case of trial and error to see exactly where we were with the load condition. We could do 9 kts and had an average consumption around 125 lts an hour (3000 a day) for a main engine and 1 genset. Running 2 engines at 12 kts the consumption was nearly double that a day.

    We had Electric Lube Pumps fitted when she was being built to use for this operation and I used to start and run the non in service one every day at 1200 while I was doing my rounds and logs etc. We would generally run each one for 3 or 4 days and then swap depending upon the conditions ( In any sort of head sea it was hopeless) and how long the voyage was going to be.
  7. Capt J

    Capt J Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,524
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    The quote by that captain is totally false. How many yachts travel at low rpm's for days on the ICW because of bad weather and such and they don't blow up. Turbo's turn at all RPM's....but more so the higher the rpm's.

    I found the opposite to be true on a lot of this on yachts under 100 feet. Running just one engine with the other one freewheeling, greatly increases the engine load on the engine in gear and that coupled with your rudders fairly hard over to go straight(more rudder drag)has shown more fuel burn to do say 8 knots, then running both engines at a lower RPM and doing the same 8 knots. According to the engine computers fuel burn read out on many different yachts that I've run. This may be different on large yachts.

    Most of the ZF gearboxes have a shaft driven oil pump that circulates oil through the gearbox, in addition to the other oil pump, and they can be run without the engine turning without damage. This is not true with all gearboxes however. Another thing is, if the yacht has dripless shafts you need to install a cross-over if you are going to run the yacht with only one engine running as it uses the cooling water from the engine to cool the shaft.

    On mechanical diesels you do get a lot of build up, more-so the 2 stroke detroits rather then a 4 cycle like a cat 3208 when running low RPM's. I run the detroits up to 2000 rpms for 30 minutes (1400 rpms for a few minutes to start baking the build up off then slowly up to 2000rpm's) to clean out the engines every 4-6 hours. Detroit actually recommended I run them at 2050rpm's for 30 minutes every 4 hours. As long as the engine temps stay up, it shouldn't hurt them to run low rpm's. The electronic diesels do run a LOT cleaner at lower rpm's but still wouldn't hurt to run them up twice a day. The electronic diesels also keep the engine temps right at temp throughout the rpm range and also tend to run a lot hotter then the mechanical engines (through design) which helps keeping them clean. I have noticed a HUGE fuel savings by keeping them at 1000 rpm's or under.
  8. captroynsteph

    captroynsteph New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    Messages:
    16
    Location:
    Longboat Key

    I run a 135' motoryacht with 2000 series MTU's. I've put about 2000 hours on the boat in the last couple of years most of it running at 1350 rpm (about 35% load). These engines are sequentially turbocharged so only one turbo is spinning at lower speeds (second turbo kicks in at 1800 rpm). We've noticed no adverse affects from running at lower revs. If anything, the oil stays cleaner, we burn less of it, & we have noticed fewer breakdowns than were previously logged at higher rpms. The fuel savings has also been considerable. We burn 3.4 gallons per mile at 1350rpm doing 10.5 knots; 7.8 gallons per mile at 1950 doing 14 knots; 12.3 gallons per mile at 16.5 knots (WOT). Hope this helps.