Recent Supreme Court Ruling: Chevron doctrine

Perhaps. Time will tell. My senator and rep from OR where not interested in my questions about their Atlantic Coast boat speed limit regulations.

It's supposed to, but someone would have to oppose them. The 10 knot deal for the "whales" is total BS. It's also going to kill all of the charter boat operators from GA North to NE that won't be able to do day trips and do what they're supposed to do on their charter, from sportfishing boats to whale watching boats. It's also dangerous, there are many times that sea conditions demand running faster to beat storms, stability, etc. I have a friend that runs a 208' yacht with jets, that boat at 10 knots rolls like crazy, is super in-efficient, and doesn't track worth a darn with any kind of moderate sea state. Also for deliveries it makes it completely in-efficient to use the ocean when you have to go 20 miles out of an inlet for deep water and 20 miles back in......so in a 10 hour day you make 60 miles of North or South on your trip? So now a lot of boats are doing over-nighters which are inherently more dangerous and much harder on crew than daytime running.

Chevron vs Natural Resources Defense Council was a landmark ruling during the Reagan administration. Chevron wanted to expand a plant and had the EPA with the clean air act on their side. The NRDF wanted to stop them but the court ruled that the judicial branch needed to defer to the administrative state, the EPA in this case. While it was a victory for Reagan, the so called Chevron Deference has been implicated in and coincided with an explosion in the administrative state. Like many cases, Loper Bright was about much more than herring fisherman. The reversal of Chevron is considered a huge win for those who would return the US to the constitution and seek to limit the growth of government and limit the power of unelected bureaucrats.