Helicopters are fast these days, but if you want to fly even faster and can not afford a Harrier, this might be the solution. The new Bell Agusta 109, can land and take of vertical, fly twice the speed of most helicopters and has a pressurized cabin. A must for Megayacht owners! Who will be the first?
A new VTOL would be nice, but for the rest of us regular yacht owners, can I suggest something a little more affordable and a lot more fun... I present to you.. the BlackShark. LOA: 7 feet Range: +/- 1 mile Flight time: 20 minutes Top Speed: 105 mph Weight: 11 lbs. Power: 2.2 hp Cargo Load: minature video camera Purpose: to be able to say... "I have a helicopter onboard my boat"
A less noisy VTOL was used on the Margaux Rose. I remember when they used it during the Monaco Grand Prix, anchored just outside the port. Suddenly the wind picked up and they got serious problems among all other boats out there. Good fun to watch though.... What it is? Click on the link, since this picture is copyright protected; http://www.sailingsource.com/ppl/art_pic/margaux_rose_sardinia_bfi.jpg
Certainly it would be the ultimate toy, but you would need the finances of a 3rd world country to purchase it, if you can get clearance. Professor Paul Moller has been working on an interesting project for a number of years. It's being promoted as the future of transportion. As best I remember, it utilized 8 rotory engines, driving 4 ducted fan props that rotate for vertical or forward flight. Initial tests proved the concept in vertical flight, but I don't think they have moved into forward flight yet. In doing a Google search, I found several links on the subject, including some litigation regarding a fraudulent stock offering. I haven't got time to read it, but if you have the interest, here's some links... http://www.skyaid.org/Skycar/over1T.htm And another... http://www.electrifyingtimes.com/tom.html And yet another... http://www.autofieldguide.com/articles/100105.html
Yes, but.... As a personal witness to the V-22 which crashed at Quantico Marine Base in 1992(along the Potomac River), I gotta say - that would be a truly adventurous purchase (paging Mr. Branson!) See what others think here: http://www.g2mil.com/V-22.htm http://edition.cnn.com/2002/US/04/25/v22.pentagon/ As they say in the British Army - "...a bridge too far". CHEERS!
I agree, she is still not certified I think, but some evolution must have occured the last ten years? Electronics and gyros (and GPS information?) might be able to control the movement as they do on canards on fighter-jets. In case of a motor failure on low altitude, it is as risky as with helicopters. From higher altitude where helis can use autorotation, this craft must be able to glide? But we will see, I like the idea and the styling though!
I remember the initial problems and the grounding that followed. Not unusual with new technologies. Generally speaking, the knowledge gained from unfortunate mishaps leads to a better understanding of the hurdles yet to be overcome. This has been true with other forms of aviation too. What's sad is... with the tools, materials and knowledge we have available, coupled with the evolution of many aviation technologies... that this sort of thing could happen at all. The Harrier was not without its share of problems too, but it has become an important part of the military arsenal. Helicopters have suffered their share of failures as well. Still... I can't help but look at the V-22 and think one thing. Too many moving parts!
I was thinking the same thing, it would be easier to have the thing standing on her tail and the seats with gyro´s inside!
Golden Opportunity. Yes, I agree, the technology is definitely worth pursuing - lest we miss the boat or watch somebody else build it. (Remember who invented the Jet Ski - and no, it wasn't Kawasaki). Still, when and if you should step aboard one, remember what one naval officer told me later, "...., she ain't no PBY".