Click for Walker Click for Furuno Click for Westport Click for YF Listing Service Click for Northern Lights

hull type

Discussion in 'Yacht Designers Discussion' started by hordos, Oct 9, 2008.

  1. hordos

    hordos New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    Messages:
    1
    Location:
    prince george b. c. canada
    I would like to know if you can make a plaining hull work like a displacement or semidisplacement by lengthening or adjusting weight to keep the boat level as it pickes up speed.
  2. AMG

    AMG YF Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2004
    Messages:
    5,380
    Location:
    Sweden
    Hi,

    A stepped hull is normally keeping it´s level at high speed if this is what you were asking.
  3. Fishtigua

    Fishtigua Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2007
    Messages:
    2,935
    Location:
    Guernsey/Antigua
    I think what Hordos was asking is can you make a semi-displacement hull from a planeing one.

    Yes you can but you loose all advantages of both types and gain non of the benefits.

    Fish
  4. Ju52

    Ju52 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Messages:
    148
    Location:
    Frankfurt
    displacement glider

    Are you looking for a displacement glider ...

    like this http://www.alsphere.at ??

    A nice wekend to all
    Gerhard
  5. CODOG

    CODOG Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2007
    Messages:
    397
    Location:
    Bournemouth, southern England
    If I understand your question correctly, then yes you can. But as already stated above, you will begin to lose the benefit of a planing hull design, and also not have the full benefits of displacement / semi-displacement hull design. Your requirements as to size and maximum speed would be a major consideration in this question too.
    It is possible to design a planing hull that does not sink by the stern / rise at the bow as it gains speed, climbs the hump and comes up onto the plane as a normal planing hull would, either by adding considerable length or moving the LCG a long way further forward...but this design would therefore not be able to plane in the accepted sense. It would begin to plane due to its basic design, but the amount of hull surface still in the water would have high drag, its flat running angle and weight biased fwd would tend to force the bow to push the bow wave out of its way (rather than riding up and over the top of it) and the net result would be a higher power required to drive it at a relatively slower speed, and rather inefficient fuel consumption. This is by now a 'planing' design so compromised that the designer would have probably changed tack toward some form of semi-displacement design some time before.
    There are artificial means that can be employed to 'flatten out' a planing hulls natural running angle (trim tabs / wedges / transom plates etc), but anything that will effectively lift the stern / push the bow down is normally used just for slower speeds, before or just on the hump (this is what I'm guessing you are getting at) Also, at higher speeds, too flat a running trim on a planing hull may result in bow steer, chine running and straight line tracking problems.
    There are a million permutations ranging between full-on displacement right up to fast craft that run high speeds with only the tips of the props and the tip of the keel and chine in the water...but they all compromise one or more qualities for the reward of excelling at others. Planing hulls will rise up at the bow in their attempt to climb the bow wave in order to ride atop the water rather than through it...its what they do...if you deliberately design one that doesn't, it will suffer in other areas of performance / economy / handling too.
    This brings us back to the size you have in mind and the speeds you want from the hull ? The design requirement you hinted at in your initial post suggests a decent speed but with minimal change between static and running trim angles ? So far its leaning toward a chine-bilged, semi-displacement hull with waterjets.
  6. KCook

    KCook Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2005
    Messages:
    1,160
    Location:
    Phoenix
    Methinks the best practical example would be tournament ski boats (Nautique, Mastercraft, etc). They do plane, with VERY little bow angle. But as already stated, this results in greater wetted surface, greater drag, less speed, and more fuel needed. Can be done however.

    The other example would be high performance catamarans, which is not likely what the OP had in mind.

    Kelly Cook
  7. Seafarer

    Seafarer Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2007
    Messages:
    721
    Location:
    Hudson River
    ^^ This.

    Huckins (ok, ok, I already hear the groans) builds planing hulls that are designed to run from a standstill to top speed with no more than 3 degrees of bow rise. They are also fairly fast and fuel efficient boats.
  8. penta

    penta New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2006
    Messages:
    1
    Location:
    nothing
    So maybe will be better to share my idea in this theme. I hope.
    http://den-k-den.livejournal.com/10318.html

    Something like:
    <10 knots - displacement
    10~20 wavepiercer
    >20 - cat

    [​IMG]

    P.S.: sorry for my Eng. - it's very difficult for me to use it.
  9. Capt J

    Capt J Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,529
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    Stretching a hull will increase the displacement speed. I run a 75' hatteras that was stretched 10' from a 65'. It picked up almost 2 knots at displacement speed and will do 10 knots at displacement speed up from 8-8.5knots. Cruising speed has slowed down a little. Weight and balance can slow down or speed up displacement speed.
  10. 84far

    84far Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Messages:
    794
    Location:
    Brisbane, AUS
    hi there

    check out the 'Mochi Long Range 23'. it does what your after i think. interesting hull design. and im starting to see a few boats come out with a similar shape/idea.

    a Hobie Cat is a good example of a twin hull form.

    but everything is a compromise. what u gain in one thing, you'll loose in another. fine out what u need the most in the design and head down that path. maybe a hydrofoiled boat?....

    far.