The following fee increases which have been posted on the government website are far worst than the AIS requirements. https://laws.bahamas.gov.bs/cms/images/LEGISLATION/BILLS/2025/2025-0056/2025-0056.pdf No effective date in the document So for the typical boater in the 34-99’ range, most of us, the cruising permit will jump from $300 to $1000 plus a newly created anchoring fee (if you don’t stay in a marina) of $350 plus another $300 for the fishing permit. That’s a whopping $1650 ! For boats over 100’… almost $5000 per trip. Apparently it s going to be one size fits all with only a 12 month option (unless they keep the 3 months option which isn’t mentioned). Also the current free second entry within 90 days is now cut short to 30 days.
If, If, If I do cruise the Bahamian waters again, I will never make land fall and keep the quarantine flag up. I rarely made land fall before but that last big storm wiped my friends (land fall visits) out. No need to touch that soil (sand/rock) again. We took a hint at Boat Harbor marina AND restaurant, before the storm, that we were not wanted. Treated like stuff. Seems like this has continued into the government. Screw a cruising permit, Just Passing Thru..
Wow, here we go again. They did the same 20 years ago doubling the Cruising Permit fee then they had to back pedal and offer a free entry if you came back within a year, even so each entry office could do their own policy. Once I came to check in with $150 in the pocket as my boat was 33’. The Custom Officer said there was a change and now my fee was $300. Told them I would go back to the boat for more cash but instead cast off the dock lines and sailed back to Florida. Enjoyed my 30+ Bahamas cruises but doubt I will go back, especially now..
To be honest, I've been saying for years that The Bahamas haven't been charging enough for cruising permits. This may be unpopular, but so many boats load up supplies and fuel in the USA and then cruise The Bahamas, leaving very little $ (relatively) in the country while doing so. We are very lucky to have such beautiful cruising grounds so close to our shores. I'm not crazy about having to install an AIS on my 28' CC, however.
We have been guilty of loading up with ship’s stores in preparation for Bahamas cruising, but have also been pretty generous with local restaurants and bars in the Bahamas mainly Bimini, North Cat Cay, Chubb Cay and Staniel. (Nassau only as a last resort) Yes, Cruising Permits have been relatively inexpensive for big boats, agree with you there Capt. Ken, but $350 to anchor? Wow. In the past the right to navigate territorial waters have also included the right to anchor. (With a few exceptions, like in residential canals, in front of of marinas, etc)
Even when we travel to the Bahamas fully loaded we still leave a lot of money behind at marinas, bars, restaurants and shops. and it s not like we have a choice… besides Nassau and maybe harbor island, provisioning in the Bahamas is a nightmare as you know. Fresh produce or quality meats simply aren’t available in the Exumas, even Gtown. Same with wines.
The proposed fee structure will not keep me from cruising the Bahamas again. I disagree with the notion that most cruisers don’t spend significant money there. I will load up before I go but I can’t store enough to sustain my family for more than 10 days or so much less a month. My memory for numbers is not what it used to be but I am pretty sure my annual month long cruise is easily 20,000 for a family of 4. We heavily favor marinas due to dogs and wife’s preferences. Same for eating dinners out. We generally eat lunch on board. All of the above being said boating is getting VERY expensive even not going to the Bahamas. Just spent 2 weeks in the keys and the keys and SE FL the average slip rate was 5-6/ft. It seems that business and government are seeing just how much people can/will pay. I think a significant recession would help bring some of these costs down. I don’t wish for that. I believe in economics there’s a name for when the price becomes so high that it kills demand. I am not there yet as boating has been a passion of mine since i was 9 years old reading neighbors left over boating magazines. Since I am mostly retired I am taking measures to keep the costs down, such as anchoring out, taking on more maintenance matters, and managing the boat myself instead of a yard.
More data to ponder Part 1; Entry Fees Distract as Bahamas Eyes the Prize, a Carbon-Credit Boondogle Seagrass Beds Said To Be Worth $50 Billion Peter Swanson Jun 24 Like crypto currency, the carbon-exchange market is something oft mentioned but little understood, including by me. This story assumes the concept is not just a figment of our collective imagination. A seagrass meadow: Where the moorings aren’t. Stand by for Bahamas Moorings II. The sequel appears likely. The key to understanding the “insane” and ultimately unsuccessful first attempt to establish rental moorings in the Exumas appears to have been something as mundane as seagrass. Not the actual turtle food: Seagrass, the idea. The Bahamas are sitting on a “blue carbon” treasure trove whose jewels are seagrasses, salt marshes and mangroves. According to DBG, a player in the carbon-offset industry, the Bahamas has $50 billion-worth ready to sell. So what did the Bahamas government do? On January 23, it leased the seagrass component of said trove to a private company in exchange for a promise of three pennies for every future dollar earned from mooring rentals—an unknowable revenue-stream. Bahamian leaders certainly must have known end of free anchoring would have been unpopular in its target market, foreign cruisers. Would we be willing to pay? That question is back again as cruising community reacts to the outrage of the day—a quintupling of entry fees. Stench The odor of corruption around that $2.5 million deal was so strong, that the same government that had secretly approved the project soon ordered that it “cease and desist” and that all moorings be removed. That was on February 23, and…goshdarnit… The moorings are still in place. Free, at least temporarily. Creating a mooring monopoly “doesn’t even make sense,” Peter Maury told The Tribune newspaper of Nassau as it followed up after Loose Cannon broke the story back in February. Maury is president of the Association of Bahamas Marinas, whose members, like most Bahamians, were blindsided by the sudden appearance of barges installing helix anchors and floating balls. “Insane,” one of Maury’s colleagues quipped. Without Warning, Moorings Going In Throughout the Exumas Peter Swanson · Cease and Desist for Exumas Mooring Installations Peter Swanson · Feb 23 Read full story The moorings are still in place. Waiting for new management? The lease assigning control of more than 4,000 acres of seabed to a single company granted Bahamas Moorings Ltd. the right to provide mooring services “in the Exuma and elsewhere in the country.” Would the Abacos and Eleuthera have been next? As it happens, the Bahamas are home to an astounding 40 percent of the world’s seagrass beds, which sequester huge amounts of carbon on the seafloor, according to scientists. The moorings appeared to have been cover to exercise control over a carbon offset to be sold to industries unable to reduce their carbon footprint on their own. Mooring fields at popular Normans Cay.
More part 2; Boaters Blamed In response to Loose Cannon’s back-to-back articles on the moorings controversy (but before the project was canceled), the Bahamas government issued a news release, which said the quiet part out loud: “This initiative is also a key component of the Bahamas Blue Carbon Project, which aims to generate funding through carbon credit sales linked to the protection of seagrass beds and marine sediment—critical natural carbon sinks.” The same release blamed you, the cruising public, for damaging seagrass beds: For years, unregulated anchoring has significantly damaged coral reefs and seagrass beds—critical marine habitats supporting biodiversity and carbon sequestration. Recent research by Beneath the Waves, a leading marine science organisation, has documented a 20-30 percent decline in seagrass coverage in parts of the Exuma Cays over the past decade, underscoring the urgent need for action. Installing these moorings will help preserve marine ecosystems while enhancing navigational safety by reducing anchor-related destruction and minimising seabed disturbance. Final Version Statement From The Governm... 126KB ∙ PDF file Download But experts contradicted the government, saying many, if not most of the planned mooring fields have sandy bottoms entirely without reefs or grasses. A prime example—where mooring installation was underway until the cease and desist order—is the anchorage at Big Major Cay, famous for good holding and swimming pigs. “The initial mooring balls in Normans Cay, Big Majors and Black Point are installed in some of the best holding clear sand in Exuma. There are bits of grass around, but nothing that even remotely resembles a nursery environment,” said Addison Chan, author of the Bahamas Land & Sea app and its corresponding Facebook group. “I haven’t studied every chart in detail, but my sense is the leases cover the best anchorages in the Bahamas, which tend to be areas that are currently free of grass. Take for example the areas around Compass Cay, an area that is difficult to anchor because of shallow water and grassy flats, the leased lands cover the viable areas of clear sand. In fact, the area that falls within Pipe Creek appears to be shaped by the clear sand area.” Loose Cannon interviewed a Bahamian naturalist who asked not to be named for fear of retribution. Familiar with the cays in question, this person confirmed that many of the anchorages are entirely sand. “Grass ain’t everywhere they claim, so they ain’t saving no seagrass,” the naturalist said, rebutting to the government’s defense of the project. As far as potential for moorings to aid in seagrass restoration, it would likely happen only in places where grass beds had been historically. “Just putting moorings in pure sand doesn’t generate growth of seagrass, if it wasn’t there before,” the person said. Sand not grass. This is a photo of the large central mooring area noted on the Big Major chart. The bottom is nearly all sand, as anyone who has visited the swimming pigs can attest. And what about the proposal that cruisers could choose to anchor as long as they were willing to pay 55 cents or $1.10 per foot, depending on LOA? Critics back in February said that if saving the seabeed were really the motivation, anchoring would be banned altogether. Today, the new fee structure monetizes the practice by charging cruisers who wish to avoid marinas a $300 anchoring fee. A bill of lading obtained by Loose Cannon described the Bahamas Moorings order for Chinese-made helical screw anchors as being accompanied by 38 and 25mm open-link chain. While moorings employ significantly less scope than anchoring, an all-rope mooring rode would be even less damaging than a rope-chain setup that this document suggests. A photo taken by a cruiser shows one new mooring attached not to a helical screw but a big conventional anchor and chain. Big anchor, not a helical screw. Oddly, this sketchy set-up was intended for bigger yachts. Greenwashing So, how did the question of seagrass fit in the moorings/blue carbon narrative? The government says moorings will protect seagrass. Experts say there tends not to be seagrass where moorings were actually placed. Maybe, what was being sold is just the belief that mooring fields will protect Bahamas seagrass. The term for this is greenwashing. Cohn, Cohn & Colapinto, a U.S. law firm that specializes in defending whistleblowers, notes that carbon-offset scams often share the following characteristics: Overstated impact: some projects may exaggerate the amount of carbon they can offset, leading to misleading claims. Lack of transparency: scammers may avoid providing clear information about their projects, making it difficult to verify their claims. Weak verification processes: some projects may rely on inadequate verification processes, allowing for fraudulent activities to go undetected. Greenwashing: the use of misleading marketing tactics a company uses to portray themselves as environmentally responsible, even if their carbon offset claims are unfounded.
More part 3; Will Cruisers Quit Coming? The Tribune reporter also quoted Eric Carey, the ex-Bahamas National Trust (BNT) executive director, who worried that having to pay for moorings and/or anchoring may create a tipping point in the cruising community. What he said might well apply to today’s entry-fee controversy: A very careful assessment needs to be done of the carrying capacity of what boaters are willing to pay before boaters abandon The Bahamas because of what they can’t afford. It can’t be a licence to print money and boaters say, we’ll abandon The Bahamas. I’ve spoken to people at Black Point, Staniel Cay who have restaurants. They say that if those boats abandon us because they’re forced out, they’ll be severely impacted. What Carey may have been too polite to say is that cruisers as a whole are a parsimonious lot. Groceries, liquor and fuel are already 30 percent higher in the Bahamas compared to the U.S. Dockage is very expensive, too. Recently, Bahamian officials have been enforcing immigration rules in capricious and arbitrary ways, stressing out many mom-and-pop cruisers. Free anchoring has been the spoonful of sugar that helped the medicine go down. Without it, the Bahamas marine industry fears the worst. Surely, the principals of Bahamas Moorings and their eco-affiliates had to have been aware that their overt business might have failed simply because cruisers wouldn’t participate. Maybe, thatnew$300 anchoring fee is intended as an incentive to use those leftover moorings once a new administrative structure is in place. The lead story in the May 1 Guardian newspaper described how the prime minister was “pushing ahead with its efforts to monetize blue carbon credits through a new agreement with a Chicago based company.” A government news release described how Carbon Management Limited (CML), a Bahamian-controlled public-private partnership, will turn seaweed into cash: Using Laconic’s innovative Sovereign Carbon Security, which does not require a sovereign guarantee, the program will see verified, additional and real carbon removals generated by the CML’s scientific management of up to 150,000 square kilometers of the nation’s seagrass ecosystems monetized over the next five years in full compliance with Article 6.2 of the Paris Agreement, The question is: How might this lucrative scheme be related to the new fee structure? The timing, of course, could be nothing more than coincidence. Come forward, Bahamas sources, and enlighten us. Tell us about those “real carbon removals.” Stand by for more reporting on the fees, moorings and other shennanigans happening in our favorite island nation. Maybe tomorrow. Maybe the next day.
