Click for Cross Click for Glendinning Click for Delta Click for Abeking Click for Ocean Alexander

Floppy swim platform

Discussion in 'General Yachting Discussion' started by richierich33, May 22, 2024.

  1. richierich33

    richierich33 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2014
    Messages:
    22
    Location:
    Annapolis, MD
    2006 Lazzara 74 came with a TNT lift that carries my 1000lbs Carbon Craft CC130 tender. In any head sea it moves so much I fear it’ll rip from the transom. The boats manual says to tow it in rough seas which is an option but there has to be a better solution, right? Locking system? Sliding chock to move some weight to the fixed portion of the platform? Ideas?

    Attached Files:

  2. YachtForums

    YachtForums Administrator

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    20,658
    Location:
    South Florida
    Given the age of your boat, I suspect the seals in the hydraulic rams need to be replaced. Hoses too.
  3. richierich33

    richierich33 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2014
    Messages:
    22
    Location:
    Annapolis, MD
    Just replaced hoses last week, cylinders are welded so not easy to change seals but doesn’t really lend to the problem.
  4. Pascal

    Pascal Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2008
    Messages:
    8,646
    Location:
    Miami, FL
    Indeed the TNT manual doesn’t inspire any confidence…. We have a TNT on the Lazzara 110 I run after having a Nautical Structure on the 84 I ran before

    the nautical structure had locks operated by smaller cylinders and much stiffer. The TNT doesn’t. One serious issue with the TNT is that should a hose fail, the platform will fall down. We had this happen a few years ago, luckily on the Bahamas bank and not in the Gulf Stream an hour earlier.

    as a precaution when crossing we now run a heavy ratchet strap around the heavy bolts near the top of the arms to the cleats in the cockpit. Don’t think it would work for you though.

    it seems to me that your problem is caused by the geometry of your installation. The brackets are really low on the transom causing the lift arms to be at an odd upward angle which will amplify movements. Ours are pretty much horizontal when the platform is up.

    I wonder if you could thru bolt anchor points on both the platform and the fixed step and use SS turnbuckles as a locking mechanism when heading in rough water.

    I don’t think either hoses or pistons are an issue here

    in our case we had to add a second stage to the platform to raise it another foot as the prop wash between 9 and 15 knots was hitting the platform causing movement and vibration. Not your problem here as the 84 as a vertical transom unlike the 110 which keeps the prop wash from coming up closer to the transom

    have you contacted TNT to see what they think of the installation ?
  5. richierich33

    richierich33 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2014
    Messages:
    22
    Location:
    Annapolis, MD
    I read about your debacle in your post a while back. I think you’re onto something with the turnbuckle idea. My sliding chock idea is on the same premise, not only move some weight forward onto the fixed portion but also somehow act as a turnbuckle.

    I did some wratchet straps to the fly a while back when I was changing the hydraulic pump (in water) but you’re right, no practical, solid options for this.

    I also have the dragging issue under 13 knots, wouldn’t mind raising it up but the sturdiness needs to come into play with that

    Waiting to hear back from Mark at TNT now. Hitting up the other manufacturers for opinions too.

    Would consider adding a fly bridge option if it was doable but it’s 1.5’ bigger than the railings. Would be nice to have both options
  6. Pascal

    Pascal Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2008
    Messages:
    8,646
    Location:
    Miami, FL
    We had the same issue. The walker bay 15 didn’t fit on the 84’s sky deck.
    The second stage isn’t cheap, $15k and it adds some extra movement even though it’s Pretty well built because of the additional leverage.

    But looking at the geometry of your lift it doesn’t look like you could add a second stage.
  7. richierich33

    richierich33 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2014
    Messages:
    22
    Location:
    Annapolis, MD
    Update, drilled out both sides of the support struts and their mounting points from 3/4" to 7/8 and upsized the bolts, huge difference. Almost all the movement is gone. Now I'm going to work on a manual pin locking system for rough seas. Something on top that keeps the top of the platform locked against the transom. Should take a big portion of stress off the lifts transom bolts in a head sea.
  8. Capt Ralph

    Capt Ralph Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2004
    Messages:
    13,643
    Location:
    Satsuma, FL
    I was looking at your pic#1.
    If your tender was positioned forward, there would be less weight leveraging on the back edge of the platform.
    Is there anyway to slide/position your tender forward when in ships operation? An extra set of rails up to or even on the fixed stern platform?
    Then when docking or deploying, slide/re-position the tender further aft?
  9. richierich33

    richierich33 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2014
    Messages:
    22
    Location:
    Annapolis, MD
    Love that idea, that was my first thought as well, if a sliding chock system were available, it would be a breeze. Then I'd simply add a pin though the sliding chock into the fixed portion of the platform to lock it in place. But if I have to build something from scratch, I'm thinking this locking plate is the simplest and strongest option. Here's my rough design:

    Attached Files:

  10. Capt Ralph

    Capt Ralph Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2004
    Messages:
    13,643
    Location:
    Satsuma, FL
    Nice sketching.
    But we are not engineers.
    In my opinion, look for another way to help your lift platform.
    Even with these plates in place, that platform will still want to sag.

    Screws and glue will not hold these in place.

    Shear (sideways) tension (lifting and side to side) will destroy the original fiberglass.
    Back bolting with heavy back matrix reinforcement will be required.
    Either top or side mounted, Access from underneath / behind those surfaces must be opened up.
    Lots of greatly expanded back plating matrix installed.
    Then rebuilding the under box frame that was opened up in preforming these back-plating mods.
    Then high strength bolts that would hold up to the sideways shear forces.

    Further, that top plate with the pins in it, That plate will deform without a strong-back helping it.

    I have witnessed list assemblies with a catch, next to the lift cylinder, that locks the platform up.
    I would investigate this.
    AND, some mechanism to reduce side to side movement.

    :)
    Last edited: Aug 6, 2024
  11. Pascal

    Pascal Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2008
    Messages:
    8,646
    Location:
    Miami, FL
    I think something like that will work IF you can get inside the transom and install large back plates.

    I would avoid the removable pins and instead have the transom plate overlap the platform plate and use two heavy bolts threading into the transom plate.