Click for Abeking Click for Walker Click for Mulder Click for Glendinning Click for Mulder

War on Diesel?

Discussion in 'General Yachting Discussion' started by rtrafford, Jun 15, 2022.

You need to be registered and signed in to view this content.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. leeky

    leeky Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2011
    Messages:
    383
    Location:
    Florida
    This thread is in the "YachtForums Yacht Club" forum, and, therefore, nothing is irrelevant. This forum was created to allow "Off-Topic Scuttlebutt." My only advice is to be gentle with the politicians that you want to blame, or the whiners on YF will have this thread shut down.:rolleyes:
  2. mapism

    mapism Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    2,166
    Location:
    Sardinia
    Dream on.

    As an external observer, I'm always surprised by how clearly most folks in the US are polarized to the point of always praising whoever they support and blame whoever they don't, regardless of what these politicians actually do.
    And even more importantly, with total disrespect of whether at any point in time they are pursuing the best possible course of action or not, realistically.
    Everyone and their dog seem to think that they (or their preferred political side) could do better than anyone else.
    As if, more often than not, history didn't already prove the opposite, beyond any reasonable doubt... :confused:
    cleanslate, captholli and Riknpat like this.
  3. cleanslate

    cleanslate Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2018
    Messages:
    1,661
    Location:
    Cherry Hill, NJ
    Hmmm...price of oil has remained the same since March 2022.
    Yet fuel prices keep going up.
    All the while the big oil companies are making and breaking record quarterly profits.

    The oil companies control the ENTIRE fuel game. Not the Office of the President of the United States. Sorry to say, It's just not that powerful. Doesn't matter who's in office, it will always wax and wane.

    The last guy inherited a booming economy , and low fuel prices during his term due to the COVID shut down and low demand for fuel. Had nothing to do with him or his administration.
    They would still be high now even if he was in office.
    Simple ''supply and demand'' theory.

    Demand is way up now ,we along with fuel dependent equipment, are back to work . Supply is low, production is low, collective price gouging by the ''real '' powers to be is up. Hence the high fuel prices.

    The prices will start to go down again, not sure when like the rest of you, but hopefully soon.

    The posted Negativity make me Sea Sick.
    d_meister likes this.
  4. Capt Ralph

    Capt Ralph Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2004
    Messages:
    13,439
    Location:
    Satsuma, FL
    My friend, Please take this with my kindness and smiles;
    If you don't like the postings, please change the channel before you get sick.
    Cabinboy and R Carnes like this.
  5. motoryachtlover

    motoryachtlover Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2007
    Messages:
    693
    Location:
    smithfield, VA
    I agree with you that fuel prices would be higher now irregardless of who was in office but I think it is undeniable (due to our Presidents publicly spoken comments) that fuel prices are significantly higher due to his attitude towards the petroleum industry and his actions taken regarding pipelines and drilling. As I understand it a significant part of the high prices of petroleum is due to limited refining capacity. Some are closing refineries in one instance due to a billion dollars to update and maintain the facility. Who in there right mind will want to spend huge money to update a refinery and/or build a new one when the administration states that their goal is to get rid of our reliance of fossil fuels. Even a monkey knows not to release one branch till the other branch is in reach. I took that line from someone else but thought it was illustrative. Why are we making an abrupt transition from fossil fuels to electrification when we don’t have the grid or the electric production capability in place. Irregardless of party that is just a dumb move to put it mildly. Do any of these anti fossil fuel people realize how dirty and Environmentally damaging making all these batteries and solar panels are? Another problem is a large part of our society wants all the convenience of modern living but has no idea of what that entails. It entails ugly industries such as chemical, petroleum, large trucks, sewer systems, air conditioning etc. It also requires ugly people to do these jobs. The dirty Walmart people. Let the blue collar take a month off and some would quickly change their tune. These industries require facilities that need to be located somewhere but yet no one wants them near them. You would be surprised at the reaction large trucks will get from some people. But I bet if you asked them would they want their home built with no large trucks and saw the price difference they would say bring on the large trucks. My point is that there is a large part of America that is seeing in real time the costs of reckless environmentalism. I hate to see it but maybe parts of the nation needs to feel some pain so they can realize the folly of their ideology when taken to extremes.
    Chris229, Capt Ralph, vacser and 5 others like this.
  6. rtrafford

    rtrafford Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2019
    Messages:
    1,732
    Location:
    Vero Beach

    You're taking facts and discarding them. We had a POTUS tell us he would end coal. We had a POTUS tell us that fuel and energy prices would necessarily skyrocket. We had a POTUS tell us that there was nothing he could do about rising fuel prices yet took measures that would ensure that rise. We have states eliminating service plazas with pumps on turnpikes and replacing them with charging stations run by small solar farms.

    Meanwhile Germany is building new coal plants. No refineries are allowed to be built here. No one is begging anyone to pump more crude anywhere, rather that's all for show. While you can believe all politicians are the same, that no POTUS could direct a different outcome, while you deflect that low prices were COVID driven, a useful alibi, there's a strong contrasting debate that could take place proving neither side could provide meaningful data to support such a claim.

    Quarterly profits increase significantly on price increases. The larger those increases the more a percentage of income translates into larger profits. Same argument can be made about sales tax on basic fuel sales, the higher the price the higher the tax percentage translates into record revenues. Yet to see a state transparently add additional tax to fuel at a time that food prices are rising, inflation is increasing, and tax revenues have never been higher...well, if the outcome is fait accompli, then why are they trying so hard to make certain prices go up?

    Lots of holes in your perspective to be considered. Not suggesting my own is flawless, but I'm not shrugging my shoulders and accepting what is coming my way. Why? Because I think I know better given the action, details and data that I see.
    vacser, IWish and MBevins like this.
  7. rtrafford

    rtrafford Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2019
    Messages:
    1,732
    Location:
    Vero Beach

    Which is why, I think, that discussions like this are important. They need to remain respectful, but they need to occur without fear of damaging frail feelings.
  8. rtrafford

    rtrafford Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2019
    Messages:
    1,732
    Location:
    Vero Beach
    I'm just not certain I can get to a place where I agree that prices would be higher right now. Keystone would be online, and permits wouldn't be restricted by inabilities to transport product. I don't think the war in Ukraine would be globally meaningful enough to create a spike here at home. A mild fluctuation? Yes, that's always going to happen. Much like the weather, just because today is hotter than a year ago on the same dock doesn't mean my old diesel is the culprit for the change. I think the quake in Fukushima that shifted the global axis several feet played a much larger role than my Detroits.

    One thing is seemingly for certain, and that is we had a POTUS that appeared to be trying in our favor. We now have one that is yelling at us and telling us to get over it and accept the outcome and the change he is requiring of us. No words can erase that contrast. If one is to mildly accept the events as inevitable, they'll find it a pretty dark day when they wake up on one future morning with a realization that it wasn't inevitable, that there was something that could have been done had they acted earlier.

    Yes, we pick our battles in life, but we never have to simply accept outcomes that come our way that are in contrast to what we see as our own best interests. If you put up no challenge to those events creating those outcomes, well, you've forfeited your own free will. Perhaps that's what this is actually all about?
    R Carnes likes this.
  9. Scott W

    Scott W Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2017
    Messages:
    164
    Location:
    Florida
    Yep. The boating industry - commercial and recreational - is seeing a sequence of events unfold that while perhaps short of an existential crisis, clearly has the potential to remake - and shrink - the industry in a way that hasn't been seen since the 1970's energy crisis. The changes could be profound and I am a bit surprised it isn't getting more (public) discussion in boating circles, not just on this forum but in all the marine forums and trade publications. And this is all happening in the absence of a recession..or at least one that has begun in earnest. The near-term economic landscape looks bleak for people who work and recreate on the water. But, it's the longer-term energy landscape that may be where the real threat lies. It's tough to see modest industry growth, much less robust industry growth, when people have shrinking discretionary income while at the same time, there is growing regulatory hostility to the fuel supply the industry is so dependent on.
  10. RER

    RER Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2009
    Messages:
    1,584
    Location:
    Newport Beach CA
    I think the results of this “sequence of events” is the final nail in the coffin for mid market boating. The 50’ Carvers and Sea Rays and the like had already dropped out. That market will go from shrinking to extinction I think.
    The small outboard market will continue to be the segment with any chance of sustainment or growth.
    The big boat market is I think an unknown. There will always be wealthy people. But economic and societal changes can affect their perspectives even if it doesn’t affect their bank account. When it comes to “yacht” ownership they may simply find the juice isn’t worth the squeeze.
    bayoubud and Scott W like this.
  11. jamesccook

    jamesccook New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    1
    Location:
    Florida
    They fully expect to control the elections
  12. bayoubud

    bayoubud Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2017
    Messages:
    1,149
    Location:
    Florida
    Well said, we have just decided to put buying another boat on hold. I'm sure we are not the only ones doing so.
    "The juice isn't worth the squeeze!"
  13. motoryachtlover

    motoryachtlover Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2007
    Messages:
    693
    Location:
    smithfield, VA

    The radio says just today that Jerome Powell apparently agrees with rtrafford. He said that he does not think that the war in Ukraine is significant contributor to the present inflation. (Paraphrasing)
  14. rtrafford

    rtrafford Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2019
    Messages:
    1,732
    Location:
    Vero Beach
    It's ironic to like a post that you dislike so much......
    RER likes this.
  15. rtrafford

    rtrafford Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2019
    Messages:
    1,732
    Location:
    Vero Beach

    ....acting as if this is all about being "green" and as if it matters where the oil drill or pump is located, or where the car exhaust or factory smoke stack is located on the planet. Many countries world wide are back to heavy use of coal. We're still chasing wind.
  16. rtrafford

    rtrafford Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2019
    Messages:
    1,732
    Location:
    Vero Beach
    Notified that glass prices are all increasing significantly, including a 21% fuel surcharge. Can't blame Russia.
  17. RER

    RER Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2009
    Messages:
    1,584
    Location:
    Newport Beach CA
  18. Pascal

    Pascal Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2008
    Messages:
    8,546
    Location:
    Miami, FL
    To quote the chief of staff of a previous democrat president : never let a crisis go to waste.

    the current administration has confessed that they intend on using the higher fuel prices to push solar and wind as well as electric vehicle. It’s apart of the plan. Meanwhile the chicoms, Russia, India etc continue to pollute at will and getting a boost from cheaper conventional energy
  19. Capt Ralph

    Capt Ralph Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2004
    Messages:
    13,439
    Location:
    Satsuma, FL
    I had to borrow this from another web site;
    79AFB896-8F4E-42B7-B579-32531A5540D2.jpg
  20. SplashFl

    SplashFl Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2021
    Messages:
    515
    Location:
    S. Florida _ Bertram 46
    History will show these were just a few "stormy" years.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.