AC Pump Trips Main Breaker

Having a single pump simplifies the system and results in only one strainer and one sea cock/thru hull

If with good access replacing the pump with a matching spare is a 30 minute job.

if you really want flick of a switch redundancy, then you can add a second pump with a set of valves and a selector switch.

I have a single pump feeding both chillers on my personal 53. On the 110 run, we have two pumps for the 3 chillers, of the same thru hull and strainer with selection switch and valves.

All comes down to preference and space available

In terms of redundancy, it's actually the other way round: in your setup, if one pump fail, you lose whatever half of the boat that chiller unit is serving.
As opposed to that, if the system is designed with just one large, multi-compressor chiller (and I've seen up to 4 compressor in a single unit, rated for 300k BTU), by definition there's just one inlet/outlet, BUT it's normally installed with at least two switchable and fully redundant raw water pumps.
In turn, this means that if you lose one of them, you lose nothing, anywhere onboard.

Aha, I see.
I assumed that the only reason for two separate chillers was to place them in different parts of the boats, each connected to its own loop.
If they are placed together and connected to a single loop, I honestly struggle to see the point, when one chiller with two compressors would be simpler and equally redundant (if installed as I previously said).
Was your installation possibly meant to be able to run just one chiller if and when dock power is limited?

Having a single chiller with two compressor is nowhere as redundant since they will be sharing a number of components incl coils, sensors, controls, heat exchanger etc.

The two chillers on my personal 53 are both connected to the chiller water loop. One of them is set to go on and off at slightly higher temps so it only comes on when needed. From mid October thru May, I usually run only one chiller.

same with the 3 chillers on the 116 I run. In summer and daytime all three will be running but at night or come October, two and sometimes one will be enough.

if one fails in summer the boat will not be meat locker cold but still be comfortable enough

True, in principle. But in practice, I never heard of anything but a compressor failing, in a chiller unit.
And one faulty compressor has precisely the same consequences if installed in one of two single compressor chillers, or if it's in a single twin compressors chiller.

In the last couple of years I have had issues with chilled loop flow switches on two of our Cruisair 3 chillers on the 116. Also had a bad low pressure switch. Minor inconvenience and guests didn’t even notice. And also has a bad frequency drive on one them…

the Achilles heel on that cruisair system is that all 3 chillers are controlled by a single electronic controller… if that fails, it’s game over .

The two chiller system on my boat has very simple of the shelf relays and temp controls, fully independent. I can probably order a temp controller and get it the next day if that fails.

Guys, I fully understand the principle.
But a twin compressors chiller works exactly in the same way as two single compressor chillers, for any given total capacity.
The Condaria system in my boat has a single chiller with two compressors, but they very rarely run together, aside from when the systen is started and the coolant in the loop is rather warm.
In this condition, with both compressors running, the whole loop is cooled faster.
But once the preset temperature is reached, both compressors cycle on and off automatically, and almost never run in parallel anymore.
Besides, as I said, I've seen single chillers with 4 compressors and a total capacity of 300 thousands BTUs, which is superyacht territory.

The point which Pascal raised is that two completely separate chillers are better for redundancy compared to twin compressors single chillers, and I did say literally that it's "true, in princple".
Where our experiences differ is that I never heard of any faults with these Condaria multi-compressor chillers, aside from the odd compressor failure.
Which doesn't stop the chiller to keep working with the other compressor(s).
That's the reason why I said that in practice the level of redundancy is comparable, in both alternatives.

Now, if I understood what Pascal is saying, he did experience problems with some multi-compressor chillers related to something else than the compressors, and if so, I have no reason to doubt it.
Every type of system has its peculiarities/weaknesses/strengths, I guess!

I don’t like those electric valves Cruisair uses for the chilled water to bypass the air handler. It s just another point of failure and yes I have had one fail.

on the flagship air handlers the chilled water runs all the time thru the AHs without the blower running. Again very simple. And the AH controls have three components. A transformer to step ten voltage down, one relay and an off the shelf thermostat. Each available for under $40 on Amazon . If I want I could even splurge on fancy WiFi enabled Tstat.

yes the Cruisair AHs on the 116 have heating elements. Never used them and I m sure that if we had to use them due climate change they s be dusty and smelly…

btw, I was kind of brainstorming the other day about I would do in a few years if we do move with the 53 to Tennessee. No reverse cycle…. I wondered if I could just out in a couple of 20 gallons water heaters on the loop and generate enough heat. Can’t see why it wouldn’t work. Am I nuts ?