Turquoise Yachts 77 meter "GO" doesn't STOP!

Usually there is shut down button at each remote station but when you shut down the engines, you re done, you re a passenger. Shutting down is a tricky decision as you probably always feel the control may start working again.

One thing that bugs me is when the builder puts shut down buttons at remote stations but no remote start so you can restart remotely.

No first hand experience on vessels as big as this Turkish thing, but up to 100' or so, I can't remember to have ever seen any boat built from a half decent builder where remote stations don't have BOTH the shut down and the restart buttons.
And I mean ALL remote stations, including the most basic ones only meant for maneuvering, either on the external sides of the p/house or on the cockpit.
If there's any logical reasons for not doing the same in larger vessels, I fail to see what it is.

14 computers probably includes unrelated systems like nav, entertainment, sat coms, cctv, etc.

Still amazing that there wasn’t an emergency stop button on the engines in the ER... and no mention of why they backed out and then came back in.

with such a massive failure why not shut down in place after the first hit.

Very scary. Still wonder why there isn’t an emergency shut down on the engine that could have been hit as soon as the gear (s) engaged...

Flag state will publish a report at some point, there is always 3 sides to the story, and so far we have only heard one.

I don't know how it works in the US, but I did read several British MAIB (Marine Accident Investigation Branch) reports.
And the short answer is yes, the investigators do look for both faults AND mistakes.
And yes, most often than not, there's a number of both of them, albeit obviously with different degrees of relevance.
That's the investigators job, and with good reasons: don't you think it would be much less useful if they would just stop at the primary event behind any accidents, without investigating each and every other occurrences related to it - also with the crucial aim of learning and introduce changes if and when appropriate?
I mean, who would need NTSB if it were just a matter of finding out that there were some gooses flying around, that day...?

That's what I figured and yes reviews are critical aid in preventing future incidents/accidents or exposing poor procedures and practices. The NTSB just reviews and makes recommendations. It is the FAA that adopts suggestions or enforces violations by the aircrew/airlines. In the LGA incident there were about a dozen "expert" pilots who attempted either the return to LGA or the water landing in the simulator but crashed EVERY-TIME and yet the FAA still grilled the crew on the decision not to return or go to EWR. Sounds like it is a similar situation on the water. No pun intended. Thanks for the info!
Again not trying to debate aviation on this forum or thread creep its just there are a lot of similarities between the two.