Click for Mulder Click for Burger Click for Delta Click for Abeking Click for Ocean Alexander

De-Rate, De-Prop or De-Throttle Detroit

Discussion in 'Engines' started by Mito, Dec 6, 2020.

You need to be registered and signed in to view this content.
  1. Mito

    Mito New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2020
    Messages:
    9
    Location:
    California
    Hi All,

    It has been very interesting reading all the postings in regards increasing longevity to the famous Detroit two stroke.

    There are lots of discussions but no conclusions on which way to go. Everything from cutting props along with smaller injectors to simply slow down, which is it? Some say over prop and run 1,000-1,200rpm other would say under prop and run 1,800rpm.

    Im referring to the high HP rating 92 series DD. I purchased a 52’ Hatt SF with 100 hours on the overhaul of the twin 8v92’s Covington with 720HP, I have the option at no cost to me to de-rate to smaller injectors and smaller props, per local DD mechanic, it would be the way to go, he claims running in the 1800rpm range and not overloading the engines would definitely ad life to them.

    Reading discussion out there in the web can sure get your head spinning.
  2. NYCAP123

    NYCAP123 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Messages:
    11,208
    Location:
    Long Island, NY
    More discussion will just make your head spin more. My question would be how much faith you have in your mechanic. He's the one who'll face you if he gives bad advice. Since it has no cost to you I'd go with his recommendations.
  3. Pascal

    Pascal Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2008
    Messages:
    8,546
    Location:
    Miami, FL
    You omitted the most important element which is how will you use the boat.

    if you abasilutly plan on only running at hull speed (9kts) then smaller injectors would be an option. The question is why would you want to restrict the boat that bad

    otherwise, leave it alone. Make sure the engines can turn rated RPMs And if you want to extend the longevity of your engines run the boat at a lower power setting. As long as the boat is fully on plane it will be easier on the engines

    personally I don’t buy the Often heard “diesel are meant to be tun hard” mantra. There is a reason why many diesel manufacturers set service intervals in hours or fuel used, whichever comes first. The more fuel used, the more heat and the more revolutions therefore the more wear

    over propping a diesel is a no no. A BIG one, even if run at slower speed. Lousy idea.
  4. NYCAP123

    NYCAP123 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Messages:
    11,208
    Location:
    Long Island, NY
    "Diesels are meant to run hard" means long hours and pushing heavy loads. It definitely doesn't mean constantly at WOT or below rated cruise RPMs, and definitely doesn't mean skipping maintenance.
  5. Mito

    Mito New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2020
    Messages:
    9
    Location:
    California
    Thanks for the reply all!

    Speed or fuel consumption not really a factor, those engines were originally designed with factory specs and my understanding is they are actually not bad engines at those specs or close to them, until Covington, J+T and others got a hold of them.

    That being said, it only makes sense to run closer to factory specs, specially when there’s no cost involved wouldn’t you think?

    Say a factory spec 8v92 running 485hp running continuously at 70% loads with say N90 injectors (example) has a life expectancy of 10,000hrs before major with proper maintenance.

    Now, everywhere I read with mentioned aftermarket companies which pumped them up to 700+ horsepower only have a 2000hr if properly maintained life expectancy, even if you run the slow, which brings to the discussion of they don’t like to e ran slow due to the tendency of cylinder wash and so on.

    I understand the principle of it’s how much load or fuel you run per hour and I read “Just Stay Off The Pins” but still doesn’t explain why such low hours of service even if you’re off the pins. I hear/read, if you baby them, maintain them, run them right, you should be able to get 3000 or so hours, which is not close to say a commercial application.

    Local commercial fishermen have stories of how long they last and how great they are, you never hear that as much from the pleasure guys.
  6. NYCAP123

    NYCAP123 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Messages:
    11,208
    Location:
    Long Island, NY
    When your life and your livelihood depend on your motors you tend to take better care than when you have more money than sense and your priority is making it to your lunch reservation on time and your landlubing guests think 1100 departure time means sometime before 1300.:rolleyes: Recommendations are only as good as their source.
  7. olderboater

    olderboater Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2013
    Messages:
    7,130
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    You don't hear it from the pleasure guys because the engines outlast them.

    My initial question was "WHY?"

    Why do you want to take a well designed, dependable setup and start trying to change it? Why do you think all these others and now you know more about it than the manufacturers? Why are you trying to really accomplish?

    Now, you're tossing around numbers like 2000, 3000, and 10000 hours. I'll say your longevity is far more related to the quality of the overhaul and to how you maintain the engines plus proper propping and no overpropping than all these other things. Perhaps you can find one of the other options that somehow increases your life of the engine 10% but you'll never know as you'll never have a placebo engine to compare it against and if the overhaul was done well, then engines are very likely to outlast you.

    You have a good combination. Don't start messing with it. The solutions being pushed remind me a bit of some of the cancer treatments that when you look at extensive clinical trials you find increased average life 3 months at a cost of hundreds of thousands of dollars and with a huge increase in side effects.

    You bought a nice boat, accept and love it, make sure it's properly propped. You are very likely to run it easier than the previous owners and easier than commercial fishermen. You are very unlikely to ever know the life of the overhauls, whatever that word means as done to your engines. I'd want to know exactly what was done and with the people doing it now suggesting detuning and other that makes me a bit concerned. What did they find and do?

    But regardless, I'd take it and run it. And if it fails in x000 hours, you'll never know if it would have gone longer or not as long with these other ideas.
  8. Mito

    Mito New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2020
    Messages:
    9
    Location:
    California
    Guys,

    I’m just trying to understand why myself, trust me I’m no expert nor I haber owned a DD.

    The DD is a well designed and proven engine till the aftermarket got a hold of it, is this correct?

    If we concentrate on the engine itself, design and capabilities from a factory standpoint only, regardless of how it will be ran, let’s forget boats at this point and it does not mean it’s what I’m doing, but I have not heard a conclusive response yet.

    An engine doesn’t know where’s going, pushing or pulling. It only knows that if you give it x amount of hp to an x amount of load to a given x rpm and fuel it will either be happy or not, it’s up to the designers to figure out what gives the the most reliability for that application. Or am I missing something here?

    The question is, would those engines have a longer life expectancy at factory specs or aftermarket spec? I’m assuming the answer would be factory specs??
  9. NYCAP123

    NYCAP123 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Messages:
    11,208
    Location:
    Long Island, NY
    Depending how old your boat and props are you could see some benefit from tuning your props as there's been a lot of improvement in that over the last couple decades, but when it comes to changing your propping or tuning of your motors I'd be very hesitant to say I know more than those who built you motors or designed your boat. Many will mess with things to get an extra 2 kts or an extra mpg but at what cost both in the price of the job and longevity of the motors. People go through years of schooling and gaining experience to become diesel mechanics and naval architects. I'd trust them over the guy down the dock 10 out of 10.
  10. NYCAP123

    NYCAP123 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Messages:
    11,208
    Location:
    Long Island, NY
    The after market spec is more use specific. So you're comparing apples to oranges. The diesel manufacturer makes a motor that might be used in a truck, heavy equipment, a fast boat or a slow powerful one. Then it's adjusted for specific use.
  11. olderboater

    olderboater Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2013
    Messages:
    7,130
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    You are just way overthinking all this and getting way too many opinions when you should be just enjoying your boat.

    The DD is a good engine. Well designed. Long life.

    The DD and the Hatteras were paired effectively by those who knew the engine and the boat.

    If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
    Robertoman likes this.
  12. Capt Fred

    Capt Fred Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Messages:
    319
    Location:
    Long Beach CA
    I'm in the same camp as olderboater and NYCAP123, Keep the tune that you have and run at lower RPMs. The commercial guys typically run their engines at 1500 RPM and get the 10000 hour life. On my 6-71 I got her with 1400 hrs, now have 2400 hrs, most of this time is at 900 rpm and never cruise above 1850 and the engines are strong.
  13. Mito

    Mito New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2020
    Messages:
    9
    Location:
    California
    Thank you all for your input.

    And correct, I’m overthinking this but mainly curious of the DD’s design.

    I got the bug 40 years ago and started with a 21’ Bayliner Trophy with a 5 cylinder Force engine which only ran on 4 due to the top cylinder not getting much lubrication, but the darn thing just kept going till I sold it.

    And the story kept going up to a 23’ with Yamaha OB and a 26’ with Evenrude then a 36’ with Honda’s to a 40’ with a pair of Ford Lehman which knocked like crazy when started but ran 8000 hours when I sold it still running.

    So now a big step to a 52’ Hatteras with DD and I get the “You did what” “Why would you do that?” Well is a stepping stone to the next one I guess. After so many comments about the DD I figure I join this forum on get my feet wet or confused lol. But it’s been helpful...

    Happy Holidays all...
  14. Lepke

    Lepke Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2015
    Messages:
    123
    Location:
    US West Coast. Cruise NW Passage to Alaska.
    DD naturals go decades with reasonable care. Hours almost don't matter. Turbo versions go from 1500 to 12,000 hours depending on the use and operator. I been running DD 2cycles since 1960 and started rebuilding them 10 years later. I had a yard that repaired and rebuilt Detroits for commercial and party boats. The people that kept their oil clean and ran under 80% of full power got extended hours. The hot rod captains got less than half the hours. If they didn't like changing the oil, got as low as 1000 hours.
    Going slower has the same effect as smaller injectors. At a given rpm/load the fuel required is constant, controlled by the governor. If you put in smaller injectors, the governor opens them more. It can become a control issue if the injector size is too far off. I believe it pays to run finer fuel filters on Detroits because their injectors have many more internal parts. Debris in a liquid flow causes wear. My current injectors are 10 years old, none replaced, some years I do 500 hours. I use 2 micron filters. Once your tanks are clean and you buy clean fuel, it doesn't matter how fine your filters are, they don't plug. I change my filters by vacuum gauge reading, but around 500 hours.
    Many commercial fishermen have way over propped DDs to balance their fishing speed/thrust and manage engine pto rpm. With a good captain that understands his engines, over propping has no effect on the hours between overhauls.
  15. wahooUSMA

    wahooUSMA New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2013
    Messages:
    19
    Location:
    Newport Beach, Ca
    Ok, I know this is an old thread, but just thought I'd ask. I have been chasing smoke (black) for the last couple years. 1989 Bertram 37 - within the last 2 months - new turbos, injectors, aftercoolers rebuilt, blowers, etc. you name it and it's either been rebuilt or brand new. Forgot to mention, 6v92's @550 hp mechanical w/1750 hours on rebuilds. Injector timing is set at 1508 - smoked less when set at 1484. Compression is like new in both engines - oh yea, bottom and running gear cleaned 2x per month. Make 2650/2550 no load. Loaded I am at 2200/2100. That said, I smoke like a Santa Fe freight train from 800 rpm up to 2150 WOT to the point where it takes 1/2 a day to clean the soot off the transom and bulkhead. Speeds are good - at 1950 we are turning about 23 kts.

    I have had multiple mechanics on board over the last year, some who are legendary DD guys in the area with 40+ years in the business. All seem to just scratch their head about the smoke. So my thoughts are that I am over propped. Stock from Bertram were 3 blade 25x28. The previous owner tuned them to 24x24, but caused cavitation, so I had them tuned to 24x27/28 (unfortunately I could not add diameter back in). But, I am thinking I might be over propped - mechanic say's no, but to be fair, there is not a whole lot left we can address if anything - I mean black smoke is lack of air or fuel, and we know we are getting both.

    I'll grab some popcorn!

    Many thanks in advance!
  16. DOCKMASTER

    DOCKMASTER Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2012
    Messages:
    1,497
    Location:
    Ketchikan, Alaska

    Isn’t rated RPM on those engines 2350 at WOT? Are both engines smoking badly? Or is the lower rpm side smoking worse?
  17. wahooUSMA

    wahooUSMA New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2013
    Messages:
    19
    Location:
    Newport Beach, Ca
    They are rated 2350 full load. Smoking more on the port side vs stbd side, but it's from 800 rpm up we get the black smoke. No smoke at start up or @ WOT no load in the slip.
  18. DOCKMASTER

    DOCKMASTER Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2012
    Messages:
    1,497
    Location:
    Ketchikan, Alaska
    I’m confused. You are nowhere near where you should be at full load WOT rpm and you have multiple mechanics telling you you don’t have a problem? What am I missing?
    Have you tried running with engine room access open to make sure you don’t have air restriction?
  19. wahooUSMA

    wahooUSMA New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2013
    Messages:
    19
    Location:
    Newport Beach, Ca
    We’ve run the engine hatches open and no difference.

    No load I am on par with factory specs and we easily make 2550 to 2650 rpm. Loaded I am not making full rpm which is 2350.
  20. Capt Fred

    Capt Fred Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Messages:
    319
    Location:
    Long Beach CA
    I'm fighting a similar issue on 671, 300 rpm short but do not really smoke. Having the props tweaked as I write this.
    Have you had the engine instrumented is see what is going on, turbo press, press drop across intercooler, air box pressure and back pressure. Have you run with air breather off? Since you have spec compression, my guess is you have an air restriction. Has this problem presisted since the rebuild?