Click for Abeking Click for Mulder Click for Abeking Click for Westport Click for Ocean Alexander

Novice question on fuel economy

Discussion in 'Technical Discussion' started by Berrie, Jul 19, 2014.

You need to be registered and signed in to view this content.
  1. Berrie

    Berrie New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2014
    Messages:
    3
    Location:
    Currently not close to a port - Albany, GA
    I have been boating for the last 20 years, but only with bowriders up to 20'.
    As retirement age is closing in, so is the desire to move up to a larger boat - preferably a 40 - 48' aft cabin and take it for a loop. The Great Loop that is.

    Sooooo......
    Looking online at boats and reading up on forums like these, it seems there is a significant difference in fuel usage on different boats. And since I don't have any experience with larger boats, please excuse my ignorance on the matter :eek:.

    Most aft cabins are cruisers or express cruisers with dual diesels producing over 600hp, getting at best 2MPG. Some trawlers have a single 120hp Lehman diesel and are very fuel efficient; some report as little as 6MPG. However, I haven't found any trawlers with an interior that would be acceptable to my better half.

    So, since we are not interested in high speed cruising, that raised some questions.
    The low powered trawlers are fuel efficient because they run at most at hull speed. The cruisers need the high power to cruise well above hull speed.
    So what happens to fuel efficiency when you run a cruiser at hull speed?

    Also, is there any concern running only one of the two engines, alternating them? You'll need about 15hp per 10,000lbs to reach hull speed, so 45hp for a 30,000lbs boat; each 320hp Cat can produce that running just a tad over idle. And would that really help with fuel efficiency, or will you use a lot of fuel just to keep that big engine spinning?

    Looking forward to your opinions!
    Thank you.
    Berrie
  2. Capt J

    Capt J Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,530
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    You don't want to run a twin engine vessel on 1 engine. It is in-efficient because the thrust is not pushing the vessel straight. But the main reason is because both engines are propped to achieve rated WOT rpm with both engines running and making power. Essentially, the each engine is way over-propped throughout the rpm range if you are only running 1 engine in a twin engine installation.

    That being said, I have done MANY trips running hull speed and with diesels in a planing yacht, it is very economical. I'd recommend running hull speed 4-6 hours and then cruise for 30 minutes and back down to hull speed. The newer diesels (electronic) are better at metering fuel and keeping operating temps up, but you can still do it with mechanical engines.....I did the entire Great Loop running a generator 24/7, and the engines like I described 5300NM's and average 1.5 GPM in a 1988 75' hatteras MY. But like I said, the generator ran 24 hours a day 80% of the time.

    I'm guessing you're looking at yachts in the 40-50' range. Running hull speed and cruise for 30 minutes every 4-6 hours. With diesels you should see an average of 1.5-2 MPG, close to what many trawlers get.
  3. Berrie

    Berrie New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2014
    Messages:
    3
    Location:
    Currently not close to a port - Albany, GA
    Hi Capt J,

    Thank you for your insight, that is exactly what I was looking for. Good to know there is a reason to not run on just one engine.

    We don't necessarily want a cruiser. A trawler with a single or twin 120-ish hp non-turbo diesel would be just fine. Again, speed is of no importance to us.
    It just seems that trawlers with a somewhat updated interior are hard to find.
    Especially since a washer/dryer is a must-have for us.

    So when people advertise a 40'-er with single 120hp Lehman or 135hp Perkins, and claim 5mpg at 8 knots, is that realistic?

    I'm not too worried about the financial side of the fuel usage, but as part of my current job I am responsible for energy conservation at a very large manufacturing facility, so I just have a natural interest in energy usage / conservation.
    Thank you.
  4. Old Phart

    Old Phart Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2011
    Messages:
    1,329
    Location:
    I dunno

    Find it interesting that you were able to access this website; but not GOOGLE.


    Some interesting reading:

    https://www.google.com/#q=lehman+diesel+fuel+consumption+rate


    P.S.- Welcome aboard and hope this helps.
  5. Capt J

    Capt J Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,530
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    The info is a little wrong IMO. Hull speed on a 42' Grand Banks is 7.2 knots, it doesn't matter how much you push it with how much HP. I would think a Lehmen at cruise RPM's is going to burn about 2 gph each. I would think in *MOST* cases with most single engine trawlers that 3-3.5 MPG would be acheivable with a single engine. Generally you're looking at around 50' to get to a hull speed of 8 knots in a trawler.

    Some boats I'd consider looking at when it comes to non-trawler interiors etc. A 53' Hatteras MY or 58' YF with Naturals. Some of the Hatteras LRC. I can't think of a trawler without a trawler interior from memory......
  6. Old Phart

    Old Phart Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2011
    Messages:
    1,329
    Location:
    I dunno
    Internet seems to think less:

    Fuel consumption on Lehman 120s
  7. NYCAP123

    NYCAP123 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Messages:
    11,208
    Location:
    Long Island, NY
    Currently doing the Loop, let me give a few observations.
    1) I don't find this talk of MPG very relevant, because the are so many factors that affect it. Also, because if you're counting pennies you have no business doing such a trip. Get a relatively fuel efficient boat and run it as your mood and circumstances dictate.

    2) the idea of running 4-6 hours at hull speed, then 30 minutes at cruise doesn't happen. In places like the Erie Canal, most of the Trent-Severn, the Welland canal,many parts of the ICW you'll basically be running at idle speed for possibly days with no opportunity to put the throttles down. When you get to many places you'll have such along distance between ports (unless you're a gunkholer) that you'll want as much speed as your boat will give you, especially if a storm is chasing you.

    3) We're currently doing the Loop on a 56 Hatteras. It's a very comfortable boat to cruise, and gives the right speed (we average 10-12 kts). Yesterday we passed another Looper in the middle of Lk. Ontario. With the wind out of the west he was down to about 3 knots. It'll take him forever to get anywhere, and he'll probably be doing some 24 hour shifts at the helm. That said, I consider this boat considerably larger than you'd want for convenience sake. She's got all the comforts of home (your wife would love it), but it's a hassle finding dockage, adequate electric, having to lower the arch, etc. At the Spring AGLCA rendezvous there were as many different style boats as there were families doing the Loop, from ours down to a 25' that's doing the Loop by trailer and being dropped in at different locations. My recommendation would be something in the 35'-38' range, able to get up to at least 12 kts. Single screw is certainly much cheaper, but twins will make docking so much easier and you will bring it into some tight basins.

    Capt. J is correct to forget the idea of getting twins, but running on one. You'd be fighting the boat and the boat would be fighting itself every step of the way.

    In choosing your Looper boat the first thought has to be about what you can afford, and the second what can you and your honey be comfortable on. Washer/drier is convenient, but you can certainly find them at marina's and towns along the way. So that's very low priority.
  8. Capt J

    Capt J Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,530
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    Yes, it says Lehmans burn 2 gph at cruise. In the size boat he's looking at, hull speed will and is much less than 8 knots. Let's take a popular boat. 42' Grand Banks, twin Lehmens at cruise buring 4gph......hull speed 7.2 knots....you're looking at 1 3/4 MPG. Prove me wrong in a trawler in the size the OP is looking at 40-50'. Tell me which trawler gets a whopping 4 mpg at 8 knots?

    To the OP, take a look at a 43/44' Lagoon power cat. With the big engines it will cruise at 16.5 knots a 1.5 GPM, 12 knots at 2 mpg, and 10 knots at 3mpg....even more efficient at slower speeds.

    To NYCAP: you run at cruise when you can to keep the engines clean....obviously there are some places/days you just can't........There are places in the Erie canal you can run at cruise as well......once you get west of Troy.....before Troy on the Hudson river.....etc.....I was able to put that 75' Hatt MY up to cruise at least once or twice a day almost everyday......
  9. Berrie

    Berrie New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2014
    Messages:
    3
    Location:
    Currently not close to a port - Albany, GA
    Thanks for the links, that was helpful. I had my doubts about getting 5 or 6MPG with a 40'+ vessel.

    The Lagoon Power Cat is a nice vessel Capt J, but out of our price range. We are targeting more the $75k - $100k range. We looked at a used Jefferson Sundeck 46', and a Carver Aft Cabin 42', which we both liked and would be more than sufficient for us space-wise. Both had 320-350HP twin diesels (Cat's) with around 1,000hrs.
    It's too early for us to purchase at this time, I still have a few years to retirement, but we like to make well-informed decisions so we're hungry for all the info we can get.
  10. NYCAP123

    NYCAP123 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Messages:
    11,208
    Location:
    Long Island, NY
    Know the route well. One east run the entire Erie from Tonawanda and one west run to Oswego. About 10 + up the Hudson (north/south) to Albany & Troy. Just saying that circumstances dictate more often than desires on much of the Loop.
    If you put a 75 Hat up on plane almost anywhere on the Erie Canal except Lake Oneida you risked killing people in small boats tucked in and people on the shoreline, not to mention the damage done to the shoreline.
  11. Capt J

    Capt J Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,530
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    There's a few places actually. One place before three rivers where the canal runs right along the highway. Lake Oneida is another.....From three rivers North there is nowhere. But I agree, you run when you can, but many times you just can't find a place to run...... Sometimes I would just bring one up to 1400 rpms and drop the other down to 800rpms just to spin the turbo's for 5 minutes and put a good load on the engine and bake off what I could, then swap over to the other one.

    However on a trawler that only cruises at 7.2 knots, you can pretty much always run at cruise.....LOLOL......
  12. 993RSR

    993RSR Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2004
    Messages:
    519
    Location:
    Annapolis/ Palm Harbor
    Once you start cruising you will find that fuel costs are small piece of the "cost" pie. Boats are tools so get the right tool for the job. Real trawlers (Nordhavn like) are 7-8 knot boats. A person could starve to death at that speed ;-)
    Stick with T/300 to 480 hp diesels in a 45 +/- boat and you will get a good combination of speed when you need it & reasonable economy. Your fuel burn rate will have wild swings based on prop load like a pick-up truck towing or not. Divine the one engine hp output by 16 on a twin engine boat and that will give you the max cruise burn rate at normal load.
    Running a twin engine on one motor is not healthy for extended periods.
  13. NYCAP123

    NYCAP123 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Messages:
    11,208
    Location:
    Long Island, NY
    You just made a very good point I hadn't thought of, and it may have gotten glossed over. A turbo boat is the wrong boat for doing the loop for exactly what you pointed out.

    P.S. I know the spot you're talking about. We brought it up there also. Thankfully I was on the bow watching out. There's a spot there with rocks coming down from the road to the water's edge. There was a guy sitting at the bottom and he looked like just another rock. Had I not spotted him we'd have washed him into the canal.
  14. K1W1

    K1W1 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2005
    Messages:
    7,427
    Location:
    My Office
    if you lock the non running shaft or run a supplemental cooling setup and do not overload the running one you can run them singly as long as you like.
  15. NYCAP123

    NYCAP123 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2008
    Messages:
    11,208
    Location:
    Long Island, NY
    What would you say about efficiency & speed on "40 - 48' aft cabin" ?
  16. Capt J

    Capt J Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,530
    Location:
    Fort Lauderdale
    By running them singly, you are overloading them at any RPM. The boat is propped based upon both engine propelling the vessel. If only one engine was propelling the vessel it would have a propellor with a lot less pitch as to achieve rated top RPM's and a proper propellor curve. So by running one you are overloading the engine at any RPM along the chart.

    On the smaller boats it's less efficient to run 1 out of 2 anyways, if you run 2 and keep them off of the turbo's, they're pretty efficient at 1000 rpms and really really efficient at 800 rpms or less. Not to mention the boat is crabbing on one engne because the method of propulsion is off center.