Click for Perko Click for Burger Click for Nordhavn Click for Burger Click for Westport

Windlass search

Discussion in 'Technical Discussion' started by ReelPlumber, Sep 2, 2017.

You need to be registered and signed in to view this content.
  1. ReelPlumber

    ReelPlumber Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2015
    Messages:
    56
    Location:
    Fort Pierce
    I'm at a point where it's time to replace my windlass and was hoping you guys could help with my choices. I have a 1993 Viking 43' convertible that weighs about 39k pounds and it has a horizontal windlass. I don't want to get into doing any fiberglass work but not opposed to using starboard as a new base.

    What I've found so far in brands is
    Lewmar (H2 or H3),
    Quick (Hector H3),
    Maxwell (HRC10).

    Here's my questions:

    1. Should I stay with horizontal or go vertical? (I think I have the room below deck for vertical).
    2. Is there an advantage of one over the other? (vertical/horizontal)
    3. Looking at the brands above, are there any others I should look at?
    4. Looking at the brands above having used them in the past what would your preference be?

    Any advice is appreciated.
    Thanks! 20150711_172710 (2).jpg
  2. d_meister

    d_meister Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2010
    Messages:
    469
    Location:
    La Conner, WA.
    None of those look like a drop-in replacement. The off set gear drive the current unit has will be hard to match. If it isn't possible to restore what you have, it would be best to bite the bullet and glass in the holes properly and get the windlass you want, rather than compromise. I would want the Maxwell; nothing but good experiences with them and Muir.
    What kind of problems are you having with the current setup? Maybe a good motor service, some powder coating, and upgrading the electrical supply will set you right?
  3. SeaEric

    SeaEric YF Historian

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2007
    Messages:
    1,363
    Location:
    out on the dock
    A 3/4" block of King Starboard should provide you with a clean canvas for the next install. The vertical windlass seems to be the more "yachty" choice. Maxwell IMHO looks to be the brand best regarded. I'd caution you to avoid Anchorlift: http://www.yachtforums.com/threads/anchorlift-windlass-problems.21887/ Good luck. I hope it works better than my poor choice.
  4. See level

    See level New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2017
    Messages:
    1
    Location:
    Here
    A horizontal windlass would be the way to go, the chain doesn't bang on the deck as much coming in due to the chain wheel bringing the chain over the top.
    It's also going to be easier to work around the existing holes, the windlass body should be able to cover the larger chain drop hole.

    I wouldn't recommend Starboard in this application, most all sealants won't stick to it very long and the vibration under operation will prematurely break down any sealant possibly allowing water into any sort of unprotected coring.

    G-10 fiberglass plate is a little harder to work with but will stay bonded to the deck. You can use the same tools you would for Starboard and simple primer and enamel to paint.

    You should also get anchor swivel and attach it to a shackle then the shackle to the anchor.
  5. Capt Ralph

    Capt Ralph Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2004
    Messages:
    12,735
    Location:
    Satsuma, FL
    We used neoprene as a gasket below our hotz Ideal.
    The Starboard idea has merit. The sealant does not have to adhere, just compress as a gasket should.
  6. PtJudeRI

    PtJudeRI Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    137
    Location:
    Pt. Judith, RI
    You should check out the Good F850 as well. Great company, great product, and great service (rebuild/repairability). Had one on my last boat and it was always ready to go.
  7. chesapeake46

    chesapeake46 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2009
    Messages:
    1,781
    Location:
    Chesapeake Bay, Delaware Bay & S.Jersey
    +1 on the Good company service.